where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

DASEL SISTEMAS
Our Phased Array equipments, based on SITAU Technology, are among the PAS highest performance in the market.

3708 views
Technical Discussions
Jean-Claude Schwartz
Jean-Claude Schwartz
14:28 Feb-12-2009
MT on manganese

Hello,

I have a client who is welding large steel plates. The weld is a mild carbon steel, however the parent plates contain 18% magnesium. Normally magnesium cannot be tested by MT, however with only 18% magnesium I am getting a very good pull from the electromagnetic yoke. The burmah castrol strip pulls up and I am obtaining a field according to the flux meter. A constant temperature of 100°C must be maintained therefore I cannot use PT (unless somebody knows of a penetrant suitable at 100°C?)
Does anybody know if this is still an acceptable means of testing?

    
 
 
Godfrey Hands
Engineering,
PRI Nadcap, United Kingdom, Joined Nov 1998, 289

Godfrey Hands

Engineering,
PRI Nadcap,
United Kingdom,
Joined Nov 1998
289
15:49 Feb-12-2009
Re: MT on manganese
In Reply to Jean-Claude Schwartz at 14:28 Feb-12-2009 (Opening).

Hi,
Magnesium is a light alloy and cannot be MT inspected.
However, MANGANESE Steels (depending on their other alloying comstituents and concentrations) can be.
The important question is "Does a magnet stick on the surface?"

Godfrey

    
 
 
Nigel Armstrong
Engineering, - Specialist services
United Kingdom, Joined Oct 2000, 1094

Nigel Armstrong

Engineering, - Specialist services
United Kingdom,
Joined Oct 2000
1094
16:23 Feb-12-2009
Re: MT on manganese
In Reply to Jean-Claude Schwartz at 14:28 Feb-12-2009 (Opening).

Jean-Claude


Chemetall (formerly Ely) Checkmor C colour-contrast penetrant has a 200 deg Celsius Flashpoint so could be used in combination with SC remover and LD 2(M) developer.

Like Godfrey I wonder if you have Mn = Manganese and Mg = Magnesium inverted. If it is high magnesium I wonder which welding process and safety precautions were used to prevent a fire starting?

    
 
 
John Brunk
Engineering, NDT Level III
Self employed, part-time, USA, Joined Oct 1999, 158

John Brunk

Engineering, NDT Level III
Self employed, part-time,
USA,
Joined Oct 1999
158
16:50 Feb-12-2009
Re: MT on manganese
I don't think there is such an alloy as steel with 18% magnesium. 18% manganses steel is ferromagnetic and can be tested by the magnetic particle method.
    
 
 
P V SASTRY
R & D, NDT tecniques metallurgy
TAKEN VRS FROM THE POSITION OF SR. DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER BHEL CORPORATE R&D, India, Joined Jan 2003, 195

P V SASTRY

R & D, NDT tecniques metallurgy
TAKEN VRS FROM THE POSITION OF SR. DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER BHEL CORPORATE R&D,
India,
Joined Jan 2003
195
12:37 Feb-13-2009
Re: MT on manganese
In Reply to John Brunk at 16:50 Feb-12-2009 .

Dear Sir,

You are right that there is no steel with 18% Magnesium. Magnesium cannot be alloyed with Fe. As you have pointed out, there are steels with 18% Mn. When the Manganese content exceeds about 12% the steel tends to be Austenitic. As you are very much aware, the Austenitic steels are weekly magnetic and cannot be subjected to MT. But there is a catch.

"THE ORIGINAL AUSTENITIC MANGANESE STEEL, containing about 1.2% C and 12% Mn, was invented by Sir Robert Hadfield in 1882. Hadfield's steel was unique in that it combined high toughness and ductility with high work hardening capacity and, usually, good resistance to wear."

The Hadfield steels are highly amenable to work hardening. When they are subjected to work hardening they undergo a transformation to martensitic phase (near the surface) which is very much ferromagnetic and the part can be subjected to MT. The work hardening is done by impacting or light hammering or during service (the points and frogs in railway tracks). Any part made of this steel, if subjected to even minor work hardening, is bound to develop these magnetic properties to various degrees and certainly the Electromagnetic Yoke sticks.

However the transformation to martensitic phase is very much non-homogenous and to that extent the ferromagnetic field is also non-homogenous and this can be tricky during the MT. The exceptions are when the part is uniformly work hardened like ring forging or cold rolling without further heat treatment, in which case the MT can be happily carried out.

P V SASTRY

    
 
 
Dent
Consultant, NDE Manager NDELevel III/3
NDT Consultant, Canada, Joined Nov 1998, 248

Dent

Consultant, NDE Manager NDELevel III/3
NDT Consultant,
Canada,
Joined Nov 1998
248
13:27 Feb-13-2009
Re: MT on manganese
In Reply to Godfrey Hands at 15:49 Feb-12-2009 .

ASME Sect V Article 7 par T-764.3 does not allow the use of magnetic field indicators or artificial flaw shims when using the yoke technique.

Try putting your yoke on a piece of wood and use these tools.
Bingo you show a field.
But do you think you can test the wood? Of course not.

The test here is if the yoke will lift 10 ( for AC) or 40 pounds (for DC) of this material at the pole spacing you plan to use then you can properly test the material.

    
 
 
Navita Gupta
Navita Gupta
08:29 Feb-14-2009
Re: MT on manganese
In Reply to Dent at 13:27 Feb-13-2009 .

I fully agree with Dent. Since a yoke generates longitudinal magnetic field, the only way we can check appropriate magnetisation is by the weight lift test. Due to the closed nature of magnetic lines of force, the field indicator picks up the direction of magnetic field and NOT the magnetic field in the material being tested. Similarly, since a shim has a known discontinuity , it is picked up by the magnetic field. It no way proves that magnetic lines are travelling in the material being tested.
Navita

    
 
 
Michel Couture
NDT Inspector,
consultant, Canada, Joined Sep 2006, 826

Michel Couture

NDT Inspector,
consultant,
Canada,
Joined Sep 2006
826
18:08 Feb-14-2009
Re: MT on manganese
In Reply to Navita Gupta at 08:29 Feb-14-2009 .

Hi Gents,

For one thing, I got to say that I learned something here. It never occured to me of making the 10 lbs and 40 lbs weight in the material that I would be testing, which really make sense, but in this situation, I do have some reservation. P V Sastry stated that the ferromagnetic properties of the material are not homogeneous throughout, so how will one be sure of the inspection being carried out?

Very little details is given about the material except that it is a weld at 100 degrre Celcius. I remember years ago when I was doing my Eddy Current exam, I had to inspect a small plate of Austenetic Stainless Steel and I was having a hard time until I use a differential coil probe. Maybe it is the way to go! Or since it is a weld, why can't good old UT be used? In this case, you may have to use a 0.5 or a 1 MHz transducer and some High Temp couplant.

    
 
 
Roger Duwe
NDT Inspector, API-510, 570, 653
MISTRAS, USA, Joined Jan 2009, 148

Roger Duwe

NDT Inspector, API-510, 570, 653
MISTRAS,
USA,
Joined Jan 2009
148
17:37 Feb-16-2009
Re: MT on manganese
In Reply to Michel Couture at 18:08 Feb-14-2009 .

Without a surface-wave 'ducer, UT is terrible for surface defects. Sherwin makes a Hi-Temp visible dye PT kit, with a foam cleaner. Works well. Passes Nuclear performance demonstration testing.

The MT would be MUCH faster, and what I'd use. Just use a weight scale to check 'pull' weight at random [but often] intervals. Remember to 'tare' off the weight of your yoke.

    
 
 

Product Spotlight

Ultrasonic Flaw Detector & Thickness Gauge: Smartor

SIUI’s newly launched Smartor is a combination of ultrasonic testing and ultrasonic thickness me
...
asurement. ●IP 66 ●Compact size: 198 (W)* 128 (H) *520 (D) mm ●0.9kg only with battery ●5.7" LCD with high resolution 640×480 pixels ●One-hand operation ●Multiple conventional UT functions ●Smart Test Wizard ●Weld Simulation
>

TOPAZ® 64: Fully Integrated Portable 64 Channel PAUT Instrument with FMC & TFM

Introducing TOPAZ64, the industry’s most intelligent fully integrated, portable 64-channel phased
...
array ultrasound (UT) instrument. TOPAZ64 combines code-compliant phased array UT with the industry’s most advanced full matrix capture (FMC) and total focusing method (TFM) capabilities. Featuring the highest acquisition frequency in its class, high resolution FMC and a 12” multi-touchscreen, users can easily visualize even the smallest flaws. TOPAZ64 can generate a bipolar pulse that provides more acoustic energy versus previous models for punching through thick components. The result is a portable tool that delivers increased inspection coverage, more accurate signals, and the ability to handle all UT inspections in one package. TOPAZ64 is ideal for challenging applications in transportation, oil and gas, manufacturing and power generation.
>

FlexoFORM™

The FlexoFORM™ solution integrates flexible phased array probe technology in a scanner to solv
...
e the challenges that come with inspecting pipe elbows. When combined with a water column, this solution can be used to collect easy-to-interpret data on elbows with diameters ranging from 4.5 in. OD up to flat and offers many benefits.
>

FMC/TFM

Next generation for Phased Array UT is here now with FMC/TFM! Have higher resolution imaging, impr
...
oved signal to noise ratio, characterize, size and analyze defects better with access to several wave mode views and save raw FMC data for higher quality analysis.  Some of the benefits are:
  • Beautiful Image! Easier to understand what you're looking at
  • Completely focused in entire image or volume
  • Much easier to define setups before inspection
  • Easier to decipher geometry echoes from real defects
  • Oriented defects (e.g. cracks) are imaged better
  • See image from different wave modes from one FMC inspection
  • FMC data can be reprocessed/analyzed without going back to the field
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window