From measurements, I found the near field structures of Universal DGS curves tend to underestimate the FBH amplitude. I know the near field curves are obtained based on a compromise derived from measurements and calculations for various probes.
Are the curves were designed to be conservative and represent the minimum responses so that to incorporate the variations in the field applications ?
10:06 Apr-17-2009 Re: near field DGSIn Reply to Xiang Yan at 18:59 Apr-14-2009 (Opening).
DGS curves do not include any reserve for measurement tolerances. The compensation for measurement uncertainties will be given by the measurement procedure. This has to set an acceptance level which is below the critical flaw size. For example, when the critical flaw size is a 3 mm FBH the acceptance level has to be set e.g. 6 or 12 dB below the 3 mm FBH DGS curve.
An article in “Composites World Magazine” showcases Non
Destructive Testing of aero-structures
with Laser Shearography.
Over the years Dantec Dynamics has supplied many solutions for the
aerospace industry. Referring to specific customer projects
several of these cases are examined to outline the advantages of
using Laser Shearography for automated defect detection.