A vessel of 304 stainless has been garnet-blasted as preparation for painting. Dye penetrant is now required of the vessel shell. Any info about the effect of garnet blast on 304 (or similar) and which etchant should be used would be greatly appreciated.
Looking for external Chloride Induced SCC. Indications found on painted surface with Eddy Current which does not give any characterisation or depth info. Further investigation required for confirmation of these indications. Thinking of 45 degree shear wave from inside if access possible, if not 70 degree (no 80 degree or creep probe) from outside. Material 53mm thick.
17:07 Jun-15-2009 Re: Stainless steel pre-penetrant etchIn Reply to Nigel Armstrong at 20:22 May-25-2009 (Opening).
For completeness, the vessel owners opted for internal encoded Phased Array 45 degree linear inspection of the outer near-surface areas already highlighted by eddy current. High amplitude crack-like responses were obtained plotting out as extremely close to the outer surface (1 to 10mm).
A susbsequent nital etch of those areas followed by a red solvent removable penetrant revealed strong indications, some of crack-like nature. I am back in the UK now, but I shall try to obtain images to post here.
The Research and Applications Development (RAD) group is a newly formed team
within Acuren dedicat
ed to tackling challenging inspection problems. Our focus
is the development of novel, field deployable, advanced inspection techniques
for use in cases where standard NDT methods are ineffective. We don't wait for
new innovations, we engineer them. From concept to commissioning.
Phased array ultrasound is now a commonly accepted inspection technology. Now there is excitement ar
ound new techniques in Phased Array: Full Matrix Capture (FMC) & Total Focusing Method (TFM). Our webinar on December 5 & 6 will illustrate how these techniques, implemented on a TOPAZ64 instrument, can improve the results of existing inspections. Register today.