where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -
Mobile-Friendly Implementation in Progress

1435 views
Technical Discussions
Carlos Correia
R & D, - -
UCV & EGROUP, Venezuela, Joined Oct 2008, 120

Carlos Correia

R & D, - -
UCV & EGROUP,
Venezuela,
Joined Oct 2008
120
23:14 Dec-14-2009
AUSTENITIC SOCKET WELD UT INSPECTION

Hello guys:
A company who I give NDT & welding consulting services, responsibly of fabrication of a gas pipeline, is asking me the possibility to perform UT in lieu of RT for a weld volumetric inspection. The joints are Socket Weld as shown ASME B31.8 Fig. 1-6(e).
The Socket Weld Joint is very similar to a lap joint, but in this case, we are dealing with pipes instead plates. The pipe thickness is ¼ inch (6.35 mm), and the socket coupling is about 3/8 inch (9.5 mm) in the portion that seems proper to place the transducer.
An additional challenge is the pipe material an AUTENITIC 304 Stainless Steel. So, we also understand that low frequency transducers are strong recommended.
I deeply appreciate if anyone has recommendations about this not common application of UT. This is valid to perform UT in lieu of RT for laps welds configurations?, what provisions should be considered?
Thank you all NDT brothers!!!

    
 
 
Charlie Jackson
Consultant, - Trainer/Inspector
Northern NDT Ltd, United Kingdom, Joined Sep 2006, 6

Charlie Jackson

Consultant, - Trainer/Inspector
Northern NDT Ltd,
United Kingdom,
Joined Sep 2006
6
08:53 Dec-15-2009
Re: AUSTENITIC SOCKET WELD UT INSPECTION
In Reply to Carlos Correia at 23:14 Dec-14-2009 (Opening).

Dear Carlos
The attempted application of UT for the inspection of socket welds would not be advisable for the following reasons:-
1 The weld fusion faces cannot be interogated with UT at favourable angle.
2 The items are thin and the use of low frequency probes on thin probes when attempting to quantify accurately is not realistic
3 The Austenitic makes for a very difficult inspection and if UT is used the welding process needs to be very well controlled to create a consistant metallurgical structure eg all welding position in 2G position
4 The application and prove up of the ASME code case requirements could prove costly - only to realise the inspection has little value
5 If the socket welds in question are fittings then the scan surafce will be minimal

If the NDT company you work with is able to overcome all of these issues and successfully prove up the inspection Im sure they could sell the technique worldwide

Kind Regards Charlie Jackson

    
 
 

GEKKO, Standard and Advanced phased-array for Easier inspection
With a 64-channel parallel architecture, GEKKO is a flaw detector offering at the same time
M2M
5 Showcases 5 Videos

ISONIC 3510
Very Powerful Superior Performance Extremely Portable Smart Phased Array Ultrasonic Flaw Detector
Sonotron NDT
5 Showcases 5 Videos

High Resolution Industrial CT System for Small/Medium Size Parts Inspection
The YXLON FF35 CT computed tomography system is designed to achieve extremely precise inspection
YXLON International GmbH

IK4-IDEKO develops an ultrasonic train wheel inspection system for CAF
The Basque technology centre IK4-IDEKO has developed a state-of-the-art ultrasonic inspection
IDEKO S.Coop
2 Showcases

More Showcases

Share...

We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window