where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -
1206 views
Technical Discussions
Deston Henson
NDT Inspector,
Canada, Joined Nov 2009, 20

Deston Henson

NDT Inspector,
Canada,
Joined Nov 2009
20
02:03 Jan-22-2010
Total Drop Method of Sizing Indications

Has anyone heard of &/or used the 'total drop' method of sizing defects / indications ultrasonically? If so, please give me your thoughts.

    
 
 Reply 
 
J. Mark Davis
Teacher, And Consultant
University of Ultrasonics, Birmingham, Alabama, USA, Joined Mar 2000, 85

J. Mark Davis

Teacher, And Consultant
University of Ultrasonics, Birmingham, Alabama,
USA,
Joined Mar 2000
85
13:43 Jan-22-2010
Re: Total Drop Method of Sizing Indications
In Reply to Deston Henson at 02:03 Jan-22-2010 (Opening).

You did not mention whether this is length sizing or through wall height sizing.

Total Drop is a variation of the 6 and 12 dB drop methods. Total loss of sound pressure is when the signal is peaked and the transducer is moved left and right (length sizing) , or forward or backwards (height sizing) until the signal drops into the noise.

At EPRI back in the 80s it was determined this was the best method for length sizing of IGSCC was the total loss of the signal into the noise.

As for through wall height sizing, experience, and research at the EPRI NDE Center shows that a dB drop sizing method is not very effective. When the flaw is smaller than the beam spread, you tend to size the beam spread and not the flaw. Hence the reason for using Time of Flight methods or Creeping Wave methods for height sizing.

A simple exercise to demonstrate the effects for through wall height sizing error using dB drop is to obtain a block of steel with a variety of notches at 20, 40, 60 and 80 % deep. Using a 6 dB drop or a 12 dB drop method, you will see that all notches end up with the approxiamtely the same through wall height.

For length sizing the 6 and 12 dB drop methods, it works better because generally the flaw length is greater that the beam spread. Total Drop or Total Loss of signal is a conservative method to length size an IGSCC Crack.

One note; Phased Array has solved some of these issues using an angular dB drop methodolgy and focusing for through wall height siizng.

I hope this helps.

Sincerely,

J. Mark Davis
University of Ultrasonics

    
 
 Reply 
 
Andrew Cunningham
NDT Inspector
Canada, Joined Jun 2008, 238

Andrew Cunningham

NDT Inspector
Canada,
Joined Jun 2008
238
23:25 Jan-26-2010
Re: Total Drop Method of Sizing Indications
In Reply to Deston Henson at 02:03 Jan-22-2010 (Opening).

Hi Deston,
I have been using and demonstrating Total Drop since the late 70s. I have found Total Drop sizing for length the most reliable method of all the many techniques. I would never use it for cross sectional sizing, especially on an ID connected defect ( the corner trap will grossly over size the reflector ). I must emphasize that sizing with just one method, is like scanning with just one probe angle. The more methods you know and USE the less likely you are of miss-sizing. I cannot emphasize enough to practice Max Amp, 6dB,14dB, 20dB and Total Drop on all the reflectors you find. Each type of defect may be better sized with different methods. So its up to you to practice them all and learn what is best for each type of defect. As for cross-sectional sizing, I personally would recommend Max Amp.

Andrew Cunningham.
www.practical-ndt.com

    
 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

NEW Wheel Type Phased Array Probe

DOPPLER NEW Wheel Type Phased Array Probe, more stable, new tyre makes lesser acoustic attenuation
...
, much lighter makes easier to handle, more slim size, magnetic and mechanical encoder optional etc...more
>

GUL QSR1® Scanning

How do you measure pipe wall thickness without direct access to the area? QSR® Scanning - Guide Wav
...
e Quantitative Short Range Scanning.
>

UCI Hardness Tester NOVOTEST T-U2

UCI hardness tester NOVOTEST T-U2 is is used for non-destructive hardness testing of: metals and
...
alloys by scales of hardness: Rockwell (HRC), Brinell (HB), Vickers (HV); non-ferrous metals, alloys of iron etc., and using five additional scales for calibration; with tensile strength (Rm) scale determines the tensile strength of carbon steel pearlitic products by automatic recalculation from Brinell (HB) hardness scale.
>

IRIS 9000Plus - Introducing the next generation of heat exchanger inspection.

Representing the seventh generation of the IRIS system, the IRIS 9000 Plus has nearly 200 years of c
...
ombined field inspection experience incorporated in its design. This experience combined with a strong commitment to quality and a history of innovation has made Iris Inspection Services® the undisputed leader in IRIS technology.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window