where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -
1105 views
Technical Discussions
Carlos
R & D, - -
UCV & EGROUP, Venezuela, Joined Oct 2008, 120

Carlos

R & D, - -
UCV & EGROUP,
Venezuela,
Joined Oct 2008
120
04:42 Feb-09-2010
DEFECTS IN MANUAL WELD STATISTICS

Hello NDT friends.

Does anyone have some link to find a Girth Weld Defects Statistics (number of repaired welds vs. total number of welds) with manual SMAW and GMAW???.
I have found a paper in Welding Journal but focused in Mechanized Field-Welded Pipelines (Wagner and Patchett).

Thank you!!!

 
 Reply 
 
Roger Duwe
NDT Inspector, API-510, 570, 653
MISTRAS, USA, Joined Jan 2009, 148

Roger Duwe

NDT Inspector, API-510, 570, 653
MISTRAS,
USA,
Joined Jan 2009
148
22:54 Feb-09-2010
Re: DEFECTS IN MANUAL WELD STATISTICS
In Reply to Carlos at 04:42 Feb-09-2010 (Opening).

Carlos, I was told about 25-30 years ago that a 6-percent reject/repair rate is the upper limit of the norm for SMAW. Anything substantially greater than that is cause for investigation. My experience agrees with that number. GMAW inspected visually VT and radiographically RT should have a little lower reject rate, and ultrasonic UT inspection should give a little higher reject rate than 6 percent [small areas of Lack-of-Fusion]. Pulsed GMAW should have a very low reject rate on everything but the root. If the root is "looked in" by another welder by viewing from the far side of the open root, I am used to seeing a 1-2 percent reject rate.

In the USA, cross-country underground pipelines are typically welded by better-than-average welders, and that reject rate runs about 1-2 percent.

The main item in reject rates is the quality of the welders. With hand-picked welders, it is common to have an entire [small or medium] project with zero rejects.

 
 Reply 
 
John O'Brien
Consultant, -
Chevron ETC , USA, Joined Jan 2000, 280

John O'Brien

Consultant, -
Chevron ETC ,
USA,
Joined Jan 2000
280
03:20 Feb-10-2010
Re: DEFECTS IN MANUAL WELD STATISTICS
In Reply to Carlos at 04:42 Feb-09-2010 (Opening).

Good question last year we were researching the same topic and could find little published material. Talking to numerous industry people it seemed 5% was considered the upper limit that people felt was acceptable but that was general. It depends upon application for example we found instances of high quality fatigue sensitive welds with 20% or higher and repairs not permitted.
Some contrcators will quote 2-3% for workmanship criteria increasing to 6-8% for tight ECA based criteria.

 
 Reply 
 
Manuel Haces
Director, - Wire rope inspection
Haces Inspección del Noreste and Wire Rope Inspection, Mexico, Joined Jun 2002, 124

Manuel Haces

Director, - Wire rope inspection
Haces Inspección del Noreste and Wire Rope Inspection,
Mexico,
Joined Jun 2002
124
20:25 Feb-10-2010
Re: DEFECTS IN MANUAL WELD STATISTICS
In Reply to Carlos at 04:42 Feb-09-2010 (Opening).

Very good answers, and what we do for quotation of NDT in any jobs, we expect to have as much as 10% in cost regarding repairs of welds and hence re-inspect.

 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

NOVO Armor 15 & NOVO Armor 22

The Armor Kit Contains the NOVO Armor, which provides additional mechanical protection to the NOVO 1
...
5WN & NOVO 22WN Detectors, the Armor Stand and a traveling soft cover. - Newest shock absorbent technology case - Water resistant design - Supports wired & wireless communication - Multiple positioning options - Tripod connection using the Built-in 1/4” threads - Simple Detector battery replacement
>

Research Center IDEKO develops an ultrasonic train wheel inspection system for CAF

The Basque Research centre IK4-IDEKO has developed a state-of-the-art ultrasonic inspection system f
...
or the train wheel. This system secures a sound condition of train wheels and is thus a significant contribution to rail transport safety. The device was delivered to CAF recently and its use allows the manufacturer to become an approved supplier of rolling stock in Italy, as it meets the demanding homologation standards of this country. \\\\r\\\\n
>

MUSE Mobile Ultrasonic Equipment

The MUSE, a portable ultrasonic imaging system, was developed for in-field inspections of light-weig
...
ht structures. The MUSE consists of a motor-driven manipulator, a water circulation system for the acoustic coupling and a portable ultrasonic flaw detector (USPC 3010). The MUSE provides images of internal defects (A-, B-,C- and D-scan).
>

OmniScan™ X3 flaw detector

The OmniScan X3 flaw detector is a complete phased array toolbox. Powerful tools, like total focus
...
ing method (TFM) images and advanced visualization capabilities, enable you to complete your inspection with greater confidence.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window