where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

WesDyne International (AMDATA Products)
WesDyne is an engineering and technical services firm dedicated to providing standard and custom nondestructive examinations (NDE) products and systems

632 views
Technical Discussions
Harris Goodyear
Harris Goodyear
06:56 Aug-16-2001
eddy current probe size

My question is why do you get great depth of penetration with a large diameter probe. The reason I ask this question is becauseif you increase your probe size in fact you increase your coil inductance, with more inductance you have more XL, more XL moves you down the conductivity curve. If you use your standard depth of penetration formula, the further down the conductivity curve you go your effective depth of penetration decreases, so how in fact can you get such great penetration. ALL the eddy current formulas contradict this coil size to great penetration theory.


    
 
 
Jeff Draper
Jeff Draper
04:28 Aug-17-2001
Re: eddy current probe size
I think you are mixing up your technical information. You seem to be combining the probe design properties with the material properties. You calculate standard depth of penetration for a given material you are testing, not for the probe. The impedance change related to increased inductance is for the probe, not the material, whereas the conductivity curve is for materials, not the probe.

If you take a look at the formula for calculating the standard depth of penetration on a given material, you will notice that inductance is not part of the equation. It depends only upon the material properties (conductivity & permeability) and the frequency at which you are driving the probe.

The formula is d=50*sqrt[r/(f*rp)]
d=depth of penetration in mm
r=resistivity in milliohm-cm (equal to 172.41/%IACS) f=frequency in Hz
rp=relative permeability

The only way inductance is remotely related to this equation is through the impedance matching of the probe and the bridge. This will give you your optimal operational frequency range for a given inductance with a given bridge impedance.



    
 
 
Avi Sela
Avi Sela
09:08 Jun-20-2002
Re: eddy current probe size
I think you are mixing up your technical information. You seem to be combining the probe design properties with the material properties. You calculate standard depth of penetration for a given material you are testing, not for the probe. The impedance change related to increased inductance is for the probe, not the material, whereas the conductivity curve is for materials, not the probe.
.
: If you take a look at the formula for calculating the standard depth of penetration on a given material, you will notice that inductance is not part of the equation. It depends only upon the material properties (conductivity & permeability) and the frequency at which you are driving the probe.
.
: The formula is d=50*sqrt[r/(f*rp)]
: d=depth of penetration in mm
: r=resistivity in milliohm-cm (equal to 172.41/%IACS) f=frequency in Hz
: rp=relative permeability
.
: The only way inductance is remotely related to this equation is through the impedance matching of the probe and the bridge. This will give you your optimal operational frequency range for a given inductance with a given bridge impedance.
.



    
 
 
Tomasz Piech
Tomasz Piech
09:36 Jun-20-2002
Re: eddy current probe size
: I think you are mixing up your technical information. You seem to be combining the probe design properties with the material properties. You calculate standard depth of penetration for a given material you are testing, not for the probe. The impedance change related to increased inductance is for the probe, not the material, whereas the conductivity curve is for materials, not the probe.
: .
: : If you take a look at the formula for calculating the standard depth of penetration on a given material, you will notice that inductance is not part of the equation. It depends only upon the material properties (conductivity & permeability) and the frequency at which you are driving the probe.
: .
: : The formula is d=50*sqrt[r/(f*rp)]
: : d=depth of penetration in mm
: : r=resistivity in milliohm-cm (equal to 172.41/%IACS) f=frequency in Hz
: : rp=relative permeability
: .
: : The only way inductance is remotely related to this equation is through the impedance matching of the probe and the bridge. This will give you your optimal operational frequency range for a given inductance with a given bridge impedance.
: .
.

Diese Formel ist d.h. Küche Formel", sie ist Viel zu vereinfacht. In der Tat muß man die Umrechnungen mit Hilfe sehr komplizierten (Besselschen Funktionen höherer Ordnung) berechnen. In der Ingenieurpraxis nimmt man nicht in der Acht, daß der Werkstoff stell sich als nichtlineares Material sondern linear. Magnetisch Permäabilität ist eine nichtlineare Funktion der Magnetfeldstärke und für aller Berechnungen soll man genaue Verteilung drr magnetischen Feldes zu kennen. Aber das zur Zeit unmöglich ist!


    
 
 
Tomasz Piech
Tomasz Piech
09:37 Jun-20-2002
Re: eddy current probe size
: I think you are mixing up your technical information. You seem to be combining the probe design properties with the material properties. You calculate standard depth of penetration for a given material you are testing, not for the probe. The impedance change related to increased inductance is for the probe, not the material, whereas the conductivity curve is for materials, not the probe.
: .
: : If you take a look at the formula for calculating the standard depth of penetration on a given material, you will notice that inductance is not part of the equation. It depends only upon the material properties (conductivity & permeability) and the frequency at which you are driving the probe.
: .
: : The formula is d=50*sqrt[r/(f*rp)]
: : d=depth of penetration in mm
: : r=resistivity in milliohm-cm (equal to 172.41/%IACS) f=frequency in Hz
: : rp=relative permeability
: .
: : The only way inductance is remotely related to this equation is through the impedance matching of the probe and the bridge. This will give you your optimal operational frequency range for a given inductance with a given bridge impedance.
: .
.

Diese Formel ist d.h. Küche Formel", sie ist Viel zu vereinfacht. In der Tat muß man die Umrechnungen mit Hilfe sehr komplizierten (Besselschen Funktionen höherer Ordnung) berechnen. In der Ingenieurpraxis nimmt man nicht in der Acht, daß der Werkstoff stell sich als nichtlineares Material sondern linear. Magnetisch Permäabilität ist eine nichtlineare Funktion der Magnetfeldstärke und für aller Berechnungen soll man genaue Verteilung drr magnetischen Feldes zu kennen. Aber das zur Zeit unmöglich ist!
mei e-mail war unkorrekt!
Richtig: piech@arcadia.tuniv.szczecin.pl

Bitte um Entschuldigung!


    
 
 

Product Spotlight

Magnetic X-Ray Pipeline Crawler

Zhong Yi brand pipeline crawler is magnetic/micro-video controlled crawler with DC X ray unit inst
...
alled for checking welding of pipeline. Move steadily inside the pipeline 6''-60''diameter with speed of up to 18m/min, Max. moving diatance 5 kilometers and provide the efficient inspection of the pipeline.
>

FAAST-PA! OEM Patented phased Array for high speed UT inspection

Multiangle, Multifocus, Multifrequency, Multibeam. Instead of stacking UT electronics and having m
...
any PA probes, FAAST-PA is able to transmit all delay laws within ONE single shot in Real time.
>

IntraPhase Athena Phased Array System

The Athena Phased Array system, manufactured by WesDyne NDE Products & Technology, consists of a pha
...
sed array acquisition system and PC running IntraSpect software. A PC is used to perform acquisition, analysis and storage of the data. System hardware is capable of operating up to four data sets with any combination of phased array or conventional UT probes. NOW AVAILABLE IN 64-64 CONFIGURATION.
>

I&T Nardoni

NDT, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW METHODOLOGY, TRAINING CENTER I&T NARDON INSTITUTE was idiated
...
in 1988 by Giuseppe Nardoni, now president and owner of the company, based on his multi-annual and international experience in the field of NDT.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window