where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

NDTSS - Non Destructive Testing Society of Singapore
Visit us at SINCE 2019
1351 views
Technical Discussions
ut tech
ut tech
08:53 Feb-23-2010
basemetal indications

Level 2 ut tech finding several non-lamilar indications in the basemetal outside of the heat effected zone. Scanning to aws D1.1 with manual sherwave and can not find accept/reject criteria for this. The code talks about lamilar indications but there is no info on n on lamilar. They can't be rejected with a straight beam transducer.

 
 Reply 
 
Michel Couture
NDT Inspector,
consultant, Canada, Joined Sep 2006, 869

Michel Couture

NDT Inspector,
consultant,
Canada,
Joined Sep 2006
869
13:19 Feb-23-2010
Re: basemetal indications
In Reply to ut tech at 08:53 Feb-23-2010 (Opening).

It would appear the metal is of pour quality. What I suggest is to find the ASTM stardard pertaining to the metal and quality you or your customer is suppose to have and see what the acceptance criterias are.

 
 Reply 
 
Jon Wallis
NDT Inspector, -
Netherlands, Joined Feb 2010, 626

Jon Wallis

NDT Inspector, -
Netherlands,
Joined Feb 2010
626
09:41 Feb-24-2010
Re: basemetal indications
In Reply to ut tech at 08:53 Feb-23-2010 (Opening).

The problem is that when you are conducting a weld examination, the object of the examination is to check for weld defects. In order to do this satisfactorily you have to scan through the base metal with angle probes (search units). The reason for the base metal examination, prior to the weld examination, is to ensure that the base material is homogeneous and therefore allows the ultrasound to pass through.

So, the base metal examination is only to determine whether there are inhomogenities present that will interfere with the weld examination. This means in practice, if the indications are large enough to interfere with the weld examination, you report this to your client. Now, he won't be very happy because 1. his weld hasn't been examined. 2. His plate material might be useless.

The next step would be to carry out a lamination examination of the plate material and this examination uses a different code which does include accept/reject criteria.

Horses for courses!

 
 Reply 
 
ut tech
ut tech
10:32 Feb-24-2010
Re: basemetal indications
In Reply to Jon Wallis at 09:41 Feb-24-2010 .

The problem is that the indications do not show up with the lam scan. They are only detected with an angle beam shear wave transducer. The material is relativaly thin when looking at AWS D1.1 so the alternative scans dont really help either. The problem that we need to solve is wether we reject them and scrap or repair the areas or if we provide as much info about them as possible and leave them alone. They are also not rejectable to ASTM 578 (I believe that is what we needed to look at but dont have the info in front of me rt now).

 
 Reply 
 
Jon Wallis
NDT Inspector, -
Netherlands, Joined Feb 2010, 626

Jon Wallis

NDT Inspector, -
Netherlands,
Joined Feb 2010
626
12:44 Feb-24-2010
Re: basemetal indications
In Reply to ut tech at 10:32 Feb-24-2010 .

Ok, I should have read your original question better, sorry.

It looks like you have randomly orientated inclusions in the base metal material. If the code requires you to examine only with a straight beam (sorry I don't have the AWS code at hand - not much call for it in my sphere of ops.) then stick to the code for reporting purposes and report verbally to the client the problem.

Maybe you need to get a sample of the plate analysed or speak with the construction engineers as to fitness. Are the indications surface breaking? If so, it may be cracking!!!

 
 Reply 
 
ut tech
ut tech
02:53 Feb-25-2010
Re: basemetal indications
In Reply to Jon Wallis at 12:44 Feb-24-2010 .

They aren't surface breaking and not crack. Maybe silica builups but have a rejectable rating but are/out of the weld an d haz.

 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

NEW! The PragmaPro Instrument Platform

The PragmaPro is based on a modular cartridge technology and supports various NDT instrument modal
...
ities such as UT, PAUT, ECT and many more. This new platform is based on a machined, powder-coated aluminum frame for shock-proofness, best sealing qualities and maximum heat dissipation. This is practical to extend the outdoor temperature range and/or to extend the power injected in the transducers. The PragmaPro is aiming at a very wide range of applications, such as weld scanning, corrosion mapping and composite testing.
>

Varex Imaging Large Field of View (FOV) Digital Detector Arrays (DDAs)

A larger FOV DDA can reduce the space and volume of the X-ray inspection system on the factory floor
...
, enable faster scanning times, better throughput and better resolution images at a lower dose. Customers can also save time and money. With these benefits in mind, Varex Imaging has designed a family of large FOV detectors (4343HE, XRD 1611, 4343DX-I, 4343CT) for our industrial imaging customers.
>

Combination of Digital Image Correlation and Thermographic Measurements

The combination of measuring results from the digital image correlation (ARAMIS, DIC) and temperat
...
ure measuring data from infrared cameras permits the simultaneous analysis of the thermal and mechanical behavior of test specimens in the materials and components testing field.
>

TESTD-PT SYSTEM

Pulse thermography is a non-contact test method that is ideal for the characterization of thin fil
...
ms and coatings or the detection of defects. With a remarquable short test time and a high detection sensitivity, the Telops TESTD-PT is the perfect tool for non- destructive testing. With such high frame rates, it is even possible to investigate highly conductive or diffusive materials.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window