where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

EXTENDE
EXTENDE, optimize your NDT inspections projects thanks to simulation.
579 views
Technical Discussions
Rolf Diederichs
Director,
NDT.net, Germany, Joined Nov 1998, 608

Rolf Diederichs

Director,
NDT.net,
Germany,
Joined Nov 1998
608
01:27 Oct-01-1998
NDTnet October '98: Forum Introduction

Most of this month's issue focuses on the full-text papers of the ECNDT '98

Sessions:
Chemical and Petrochemical Industries - NDT of Welds - Nuclear Industry.

In conjunction with this month's topics, we are pleased to introduce
Ed Ginzel, Rainer Maier and Hermann Wüstenberg as Virtual Session
Chairmen of our Discussion Forum.

Ed Ginzel
Materials Research Institute.
His area of expertise is the NDT of welds.

Rainer Meier
works for the Siemens KWU Power Generation Group

Hermann Wuestenberg of BAM Berlin.
He is Member of Germany's Reactor Safety Board.

For a Start:
- Discussion of TOFD continues with new arguments.
Instead of replacing other techniques, should TOFD be used as an add-on,
increasing the Probability Of Detection (POD) from 90 to 95% TOFD ?!

- Is the worldwide nuclear industry safe enough?
Or do we need more NDT service intervals?

- NDT helps make environments safe from accidents in the Chemical and
Petrochemical Industries

We welcome any questions or comments that you may have.

Rolf Diederichs


    
 
 Reply 
 
Ed Ginzel
R & D, -
Materials Research Institute, Canada, Joined Nov 1998, 1266

Ed Ginzel

R & D, -
Materials Research Institute,
Canada,
Joined Nov 1998
1266
02:27 Oct-02-1998
Re: NDTnet October '98: Forum Introduction
In the intro to this month's discussion Rolf Diederich suggested considering
that TOFD only adds 5% POD to traditional Pulse-Echo (PE) UT.

Has there been a similar evaluation of adding Pulse-Echo to a TOFD test?
Does traditional PE add only a small incremental value in POD? Is the cost benefit
of missing the 5% either way (adding TOFD to PE or PE to TOFD) so small it can be ignored?

The application of TOFD is not so difficult now as it had been in the past and if an encoded
system is used the addition of a TOFD pair of probes should not represent a
significant cost consideration. Besides, the concept of TOFD is nothing more than forward scatter UT.
Sizing and linearising features are just "Bells and Whistles" that make it more quantitative.

If we simply look at POD then TOFD is probably better than PE as it is not amplitude based.
However, from an evaluation point of view most acceptance criteria are based on amplitude response,
and echo dynamics using PE allows a much better characterisation method.

It seems now that both TOFD and PE hold a niche in UT.
However, considering the relative ease with which mechanised systems can now incorporate both
PE and TOFD it seems a waste of technology not to use both at the same time if they are available.
It is only a matter of time before customers figure out that the standard software in a mechanised
system has both PE and TOFD data displays available and they are being ripped off if they are
charged a great deal more for an extra 2 probes and a toggle on the software display to activate TOFD.

Ed

: - Discussion of TOFD continues with new arguments.
: Instead of replacing other techniques, should TOFD be used as an add-on,
: increasing the Probability Of Detection (POD) from 90 to 95% TOFD ?!




    
 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

ISAFE3 Intrinsically Safe Sensor System

ISAFE3 intrinsically safe sensor system of Vallen Systeme is especially targeted at the petrochemica
...
l - as well as oil and gas transportation industry. The sensor system is designed for permanent monitoring or periodic inspection tasks. Sensors are available for different AE-frequency ranges optimized for corrosion and fatigue crack detection and other applications. The ISAFE 3 sensor system consists of an AE-sensor (model ISAS3) certified according to ATEX/IEC for installation in zone 0, gas group IIC, IP68, 20 to +60 °C, and a signal isolator (model SISO3) certified for installation in zone 2. An ISAS3 sensor can be mounted in atmosphere or submerged, e.g. in water or crude oil. It is supported by mounting tools for temporary (magnets) or permanent (welded) installation. ISAFE3 supports automatic sensor coupling test and can be used with any AE signal processor supporting 28V supply at 90 mA peak, e.g. Vallen Systeme ASIP-2/A.
>

NOVO Armor 15 & NOVO Armor 22

The Armor Kit Contains the NOVO Armor, which provides additional mechanical protection to the NOVO 1
...
5WN & NOVO 22WN Detectors, the Armor Stand and a traveling soft cover. - Newest shock absorbent technology case - Water resistant design - Supports wired & wireless communication - Multiple positioning options - Tripod connection using the Built-in 1/4” threads - Simple Detector battery replacement
>

NDT Master Lecturer

In the program both university professors and practitioners will give lectures, which guarantees the
...
oretical depth and practical inside. Academic Director: Prof. Dr. Christian Boller
The following lecturers are not complete: Prof. Tadeusz Stepinski, Prof. Wieslaw Staszewski, Prof. Frank Walther, Prof. Giovanni Bruno, Prof. Gerd Dobmann, Prof. Philippe Guy
>

IntraPhase Athena Phased Array System

The Athena Phased Array system, manufactured by WesDyne NDE Products & Technology, consists of a pha
...
sed array acquisition system and PC running IntraSpect software. A PC is used to perform acquisition, analysis and storage of the data. System hardware is capable of operating up to four data sets with any combination of phased array or conventional UT probes. NOW AVAILABLE IN 64-64 CONFIGURATION.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window