where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

PBP Optel sp. z o.o.
Weare searching new ways - in ultrasonic techniques- in creation of new productsUltrasonic instruments - Ultrasonic Testing Card
2209 views
Technical Discussions
Egan Dryczewycz
Egan Dryczewycz
02:36 Jan-15-2002
Level 3 good or bad?

I have been debating on writing my level 3 CGSB exams for MPI & LPI, but have heard that doors sometime close when you make the move from a level 2 to 3.

I would appreciate any feedback, has anybody experienced this or are level 3 as much in demand as level 2's.

Thanks in advance for the help.


    
 
 Reply 
 
Dave Wilkes
Dave Wilkes
07:48 Jan-16-2002
Re: Level 3 good or bad?
This situation was discussed on NDTCabin in an
article called

Level 3 qualifications are they worth it ?

http://www.ndtcabin.com/level3.asp

You are quite right to be concerned. Many employers
do regard Level 3's as being overqualified and it
could well cost you work.

But if you want to advance to Management then you
have little choice.

No easy answer for you I am afraid but do take a look
at what other people have said in that article.

Regards

Dave Wilkes
Asst Editor
NDTCabin



    
 
 Reply 
 
Jeff Leak
Jeff Leak
04:36 Jan-17-2002
Re: Level 3 good or bad?
I read over the NDTCabin link ... some good perspectives in that article: must read.

Jeff


: This situation was discussed on NDTCabin in an
: article called
.
: Level 3 qualifications are they worth it ?
.
: http://www.ndtcabin.com/level3.asp
.
: You are quite right to be concerned. Many employers
: do regard Level 3's as being overqualified and it
: could well cost you work.
.
: But if you want to advance to Management then you
: have little choice.
.
: No easy answer for you I am afraid but do take a look
: at what other people have said in that article.
.
: Regards
.
: Dave Wilkes
: Asst Editor
: NDTCabin
.



    
 
 Reply 
 
S.V.Swamy
Engineering, - Material Testing Inspection & Quality Control
Retired from Nuclear Fuel Complex , India, Joined Feb 2001, 787

S.V.Swamy

Engineering, - Material Testing Inspection & Quality Control
Retired from Nuclear Fuel Complex ,
India,
Joined Feb 2001
787
08:41 Jan-20-2002
Re: Level 3 good or bad?
It does look like a real dilemma. But are you planning to do level III and continue in the existing company or are you planning to quit and start looking all over again? If you want to continue with the present employer, it will be a good idea to discuss the prospect with the boss or other senior colleagues. If it is a question of looking afresh, I would suggest discussing with the recruitment agencies in the field. Again, good luck.

Swamy

: I read over the NDTCabin link ... some good perspectives in that article: must read.
.
: Jeff
.
:
: : This situation was discussed on NDTCabin in an
: : article called
: .
: : Level 3 qualifications are they worth it ?
: .
: : http://www.ndtcabin.com/level3.asp
: .
: : You are quite right to be concerned. Many employers
: : do regard Level 3's as being overqualified and it
: : could well cost you work.
: .
: : But if you want to advance to Management then you
: : have little choice.
: .
: : No easy answer for you I am afraid but do take a look
: : at what other people have said in that article.
: .
: : Regards
: .
: : Dave Wilkes
: : Asst Editor
: : NDTCabin
: .
.



    
 
 Reply 
 
Egan Dryczewycz
Egan Dryczewycz
02:54 Jan-22-2002
Re: Level 3 good or bad?
My current employer would like me to become a level 3 only for reasons of clout. We have no need for a level 3 but to sign of maybe one or two procedures a year.

I was just concerned that when and if I wished to seek new employment (seems to be once every 3 year) that becoming one would affect my marketability. General Consensus is that it would.

I like being a level 2 in RT, PT, and MT, I find the wage to be adequate and the work I perform to be interesting and challenging.

Thanks to all who replied, you helped make my decision that I am content right where I'am.

Egan


: It does look like a real dilemma. But are you planning to do level III and continue in the existing company or are you planning to quit and start looking all over again? If you want to continue with the present employer, it will be a good idea to discuss the prospect with the boss or other senior colleagues. If it is a question of looking afresh, I would suggest discussing with the recruitment agencies in the field. Again, good luck.
.
: Swamy
.
: : I read over the NDTCabin link ... some good perspectives in that article: must read.
: .
: : Jeff
: .
: :
: : : This situation was discussed on NDTCabin in an
: : : article called
: : .
: : : Level 3 qualifications are they worth it ?
: : .
: : : http://www.ndtcabin.com/level3.asp
: : .
: : : You are quite right to be concerned. Many employers
: : : do regard Level 3's as being overqualified and it
: : : could well cost you work.
: : .
: : : But if you want to advance to Management then you
: : : have little choice.
: : .
: : : No easy answer for you I am afraid but do take a look
: : : at what other people have said in that article.
: : .
: : : Regards
: : .
: : : Dave Wilkes
: : : Asst Editor
: : : NDTCabin
: : .
: .
.



    
 
 Reply 
 
FER
FER
03:49 Jan-22-2002
Re: Level 3 good or bad?
: My current employer would like me to become a level 3 only for reasons of clout. We have no need for a level 3 but to sign of maybe one or two procedures a year.
.
: I was just concerned that when and if I wished to seek new employment (seems to be once every 3 year) that becoming one would affect my marketability. General Consensus is that it would.
.
: I like being a level 2 in RT, PT, and MT, I find the wage to be adequate and the work I perform to be interesting and challenging.
.
: Thanks to all who replied, you helped make my decision that I am content right where I'am.
.
: Egan
.
.
:
: : It does look like a real dilemma. But are you planning to do level III and continue in the existing company or are you planning to quit and start looking all over again? If you want to continue with the present employer, it will be a good idea to discuss the prospect with the boss or other senior colleagues. If it is a question of looking afresh, I would suggest discussing with the recruitment agencies in the field. Again, good luck.
: .
: : Swamy
: .
: : : I read over the NDTCabin link ... some good perspectives in that article: must read.
: : .
: : : Jeff
: : .
: : :
: : : : This situation was discussed on NDTCabin in an
: : : : article called
: : : .
: : : : Level 3 qualifications are they worth it ?
: : : .
: : : : http://www.ndtcabin.com/level3.asp
: : : .
: : : : You are quite right to be concerned. Many employers
: : : : do regard Level 3's as being overqualified and it
: : : : could well cost you work.
: : : .
: : : : But if you want to advance to Management then you
: : : : have little choice.
: : : .
: : : : No easy answer for you I am afraid but do take a look
: : : : at what other people have said in that article.
: : : .
: : : : Regards
: : : .
: : : : Dave Wilkes
: : : : Asst Editor
: : : : NDTCabin
: : : .
: : .
: .
.
You can still take a job as a Level II onceyou gain Level III status. If the opportunity comes for your employer to pay for you to become a Level III, I say go for it. It can't possibly hurt you.
FER
RNDT


    
 
 Reply 
 
Ed Kork
Ed Kork
06:27 Feb-17-2002
Re: Level 3 good or bad?
I say go for it. As with any field, if you are good, and willing to travel, having Level III certs can OPEN doors. I would suggest gaining national certification such as the ASNT NDT Level III cert issued BY the ASNT in Columbus, Ohio. Or, if you're in Canada, getting the CGSB Level III NDT cert in your appropriate Discipline/Sector. These national certifications have pretty high standards, so having them should say something about your qualifications to your potential employer.

Ed Korkowski
edkork@aol.com
NDT Level III ASNT/CGSB

: : My current employer would like me to become a level 3 only for reasons of clout. We have no need for a level 3 but to sign of maybe one or two procedures a year.
: .
: : I was just concerned that when and if I wished to seek new employment (seems to be once every 3 year) that becoming one would affect my marketability. General Consensus is that it would.
: .
: : I like being a level 2 in RT, PT, and MT, I find the wage to be adequate and the work I perform to be interesting and challenging.
: .
: : Thanks to all who replied, you helped make my decision that I am content right where I'am.
: .
: : Egan
: .
: .
: :
: : : It does look like a real dilemma. But are you planning to do level III and continue in the existing company or are you planning to quit and start looking all over again? If you want to continue with the present employer, it will be a good idea to discuss the prospect with the boss or other senior colleagues. If it is a question of looking afresh, I would suggest discussing with the recruitment agencies in the field. Again, good luck.
: : .
: : : Swamy
: : .
: : : : I read over the NDTCabin link ... some good perspectives in that article: must read.
: : : .
: : : : Jeff
: : : .
: : : :
: : : : : This situation was discussed on NDTCabin in an
: : : : : article called
: : : : .
: : : : : Level 3 qualifications are they worth it ?
: : : : .
: : : : : http://www.ndtcabin.com/level3.asp
: : : : .
: : : : : You are quite right to be concerned. Many employers
: : : : : do regard Level 3's as being overqualified and it
: : : : : could well cost you work.
: : : : .
: : : : : But if you want to advance to Management then you
: : : : : have little choice.
: : : : .
: : : : : No easy answer for you I am afraid but do take a look
: : : : : at what other people have said in that article.
: : : : .
: : : : : Regards
: : : : .
: : : : : Dave Wilkes
: : : : : Asst Editor
: : : : : NDTCabin
: : : : .
: : : .
: : .
: .
: You can still take a job as a Level II once you gain Level III status. If the opportunity comes for your employer to pay for you to become a Level III, I say go for it. It can't possibly hurt you.
: FER
: RNDT
.



    
 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

Sci Aps Z-Series Portable Handheld Analysers

The world’s only handheld analyzer that measures carbon content in stainless (yes even L-grades),s
...
teels, and cast irons. Also accepted for low Si analysis for sulfidic corrosion analysis, and is widely used in the power industry for Cr analysis, for flow accelerated corrosion applications.
>

FD800 Bench Top Flaw Detectors

The bench-top FD800 flaw detector range combines state-of-the-art flaw detection with advanced mater
...
ial thickness capabilities. Designed for use in the laboratory these gauges are the tool you need for all your flaw detecting needs.
>

FAAST-PA! OEM Patented phased Array for high speed UT inspection

Multiangle, Multifocus, Multifrequency, Multibeam. Instead of stacking UT electronics and having m
...
any PA probes, FAAST-PA is able to transmit all delay laws within ONE single shot in Real time.
>

ISONIC 3510

Very Powerful Superior Performance Extremely Portable Smart Phased Array Ultrasonic Flaw Detector an
...
d Recorder with 2 Conventional UT and TOFD Channels uniquely combines PA, single- and multi-channel conventional UT, and TOFD modalities providing 100% raw data recording and imaging. Suitable for all kinds of every-day ultrasonic inspections
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window