where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

NOVO DR
develops and manufactures cutting edge Portable Digital Radiography X-ray Inspection Systems.

2085 views
Technical Discussions
Ingolf Hertlin
Ingolf Hertlin
07:51 Feb-25-2002
Classification of NDT methods

I would like to know if it is possible to classify NDT methods into VOLUME ORIENTED METHODS and SURFACE ORIENTED METHODS and whether the following assignment of commonly used NDT methods is correct:

1) VOLUME ORIENTED METHODS
- radiography
- resonant analysis
- sound emission
- thermography
- ultrasonic

2) SURFACE ORIENTED METHODS
- dye penetrant
- eddy current
- magnetic particle
- visual inspection

Are there other important methods that are not assigned?
Any comment welcome!

Best regards
Ingolf Hertlin
RTE Akustik + Prueftechnik GmbH
ihertlin@rte.de
www.rte.de


    
 
 
Dave Utrata
R & D,
Center for NDE, Iowa State University, USA, Joined Feb 2000, 37

Dave Utrata

R & D,
Center for NDE, Iowa State University,
USA,
Joined Feb 2000
37
08:06 Feb-25-2002
Re: Classification of NDT methods
I'm sure you will get many different responses to this question; I have to wonder why you would want to perform such a classification to begin with. The analysis seems to focus on surface or volumetirc FLAW detection, which is troublesome to my way of thinking.

Yes, eddy current will find surface flaws, but is also invaluable for material characterization. Ultrasonic velocity/attenuation measurement for this is likewise overlooked.

In my perspective (and I often teach the subject of NDE/T to non-NDE/T personnel) is that each tool has a different purpose, complete with its own advantages and limitations. Sometimes the overlap between methods is messy, but that's life, and we take a closer look at needs and cost constraints.

Interesting post, and as with many posts here, it opens a broader discussion.


    
 
 
Jamie Gauthier
Jamie Gauthier
00:22 Feb-25-2002
Re: Classification of NDT methods
This will be quite the "can of worms". There are many ways to determine surface and volumetric flaws. An inspection technique that would fall under UT would be TOFD (Time of Flight Diffraction). This is an excellent tool for volumetric and flaw sizing.

I apologize if this was already assumed under the heading UT.

Sincerely,

Jamie Gauthier
Electronics Service/IT Support Manager
Advanced NDE Division
RTD Quality Services Inc.


    
 
 
Peter Philipp
Consultant
PQS, United Kingdom, Joined Jan 2002, 7

Peter Philipp

Consultant
PQS,
United Kingdom,
Joined Jan 2002
7
08:32 Mar-02-2002
Re: Classification of NDT methods
Re Classification of NDT methods.

There is a new method of NDT that you have not included. It is Long Lange ultrasonics using guided waves.

More information can be found on the Guided Ultrasonics Ltd website.

This method is a Volume method as it screens 100% of the pipe material for the diagnostic length which can be up to 75m in each direction from the test location.


    
 
 
D. Robert Hay
Engineering,
TISEC Inc., Canada, Joined Apr 2002, 3

D. Robert Hay

Engineering,
TISEC Inc.,
Canada,
Joined Apr 2002
3
03:31 Apr-01-2002
Re: Classification of NDT methods
The classification you propose is a basic distinction that is or should be pointed out in NDT courses. The "surface-oriented" methods indeed limited to either surface-breaking flaws or those subsurface defects that can be detected by some physical manifestation at the surface. Finally, these methods are not useful for defects that are deeper into the material.

So what you are saying is correct. Perhaps if you can tweak the terminology somewhat it would be better. The term surface implies two dimensional whereas these surface-breaking flaws are not 2-dimensional. And voumentric implies 3-D. So this terminology may not be appropriate.





    
 
 

Product Spotlight

iProbe - USB Phased Array Probe

Turn your PC, Laptop or Tablet into a powerful 32:64 Phased Array system with our USB powered Phas
...
ed Array iProbe and inspection software package. Perform affordable weld inspection and corrosion mapping inspections with this powerful but small system. The probe has a 100V pulser, 8K PRF, dual axis encoder input and achieves outstanding signal quality.
>

NEW! The PragmaPro Instrument Platform

The PragmaPro is based on a modular cartridge technology and supports various NDT instrument modal
...
ities such as UT, PAUT, ECT and many more. This new platform is based on a machined, powder-coated aluminum frame for shock-proofness, best sealing qualities and maximum heat dissipation. This is practical to extend the outdoor temperature range and/or to extend the power injected in the transducers. The PragmaPro is aiming at a very wide range of applications, such as weld scanning, corrosion mapping and composite testing.
>

XRHRobotStar

In high volume industries like automotive the requirement for a hundred percent X-ray inspection c
...
reates a bottleneck in the production. The XRHRobotStar is a fully Automated Defect Recognition (ADR) capable robot-system that allows an ultra-fast in-line inspection.
>

Robotic laser shearography enables 100% inspection of complex, flight-critical composite structures

An article in “Composites World Magazine” showcases Non Destructive Testing of aero-structures
...
with Laser Shearography. Over the years Dantec Dynamics has supplied many solutions for the aerospace industry. Referring to specific customer projects several of these cases are examined to outline the advantages of using Laser Shearography for automated defect detection.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window