where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -
Mobile-Friendly Implementation in Progress

997 views
Technical Discussions
Wang
Consultant
United Kingdom, Joined Apr 2002, 2

Wang

Consultant
United Kingdom,
Joined Apr 2002
2
06:19 Apr-16-2002
Probability of detection

Dear All

I am currently doing a literature survey to try to derive some meaningful generic format for POD (Probability of detection), to welded structures for a start. We are aiming to have a standard procedure at the end. This is following some large projects in the European scene, e.g. PISC, TIP, NORDTEST etc. It is noted that the probability of detection is dependent on so many points but to date, it is still an art rather than science, despite considerable investment over the many years.

I would like to know, 1) any new approach to treat this old problem
2) any relevant literature, e.g. data bank, QNDE etc.

With many regards




    
 
 
Dave
R & D
TRI/Austin, USA, Joined Nov 2001, 41

Dave

R & D
TRI/Austin,
USA,
Joined Nov 2001
41
03:55 Apr-17-2002
Re: Probability of detection
Dear Wang:

It is not clear to me what you mean by a "format for POD".

If you are looking for references describing how to conduct experiments to determine POD, I suggest you read:

Floyd Spencer, Giancarlo Borgonovi, Dennis Roach, Don Schurman, Ron Smith
Reliability Assessment at Airline Inspection Facilities Volume I:
A Generic Protocol for Inspection Reliability Experiments
DOT/FAA/CT-92/12, I
March 1993

Nondestructive Evaluation System Reliability Assessment
MIL-HDBK-1823
30 April 1999
(also available previously as AGARD-LS-190)

These are of course aerospace-based.

For a collection of POD data, see the NDE Capabilities Databook, 3rd edition, go to http://www.ntiac.com

As for it being an art, I don't think that is the case. The experimental methods and statistical analysis methods for the experiment results are mature and have been published.

What do you desire from a new approach?

Regards, Dave.

david.forsyth@nrc.ca

: Dear All
.
: I am currently doing a literature survey to try to derive some meaningful generic format for POD (Probability of detection), to welded structures for a start. We are aiming to have a standard procedure at the end. This is following some large projects in the European scene, e.g. PISC, TIP, NORDTEST etc. It is noted that the probability of detection is dependent on so many points but to date, it is still an art rather than science, despite considerable investment over the many years.
.
: I would like to know, 1) any new approach to treat this old problem
: 2) any relevant literature, e.g. data bank, QNDE etc.
.
: With many regards
.



    
 
 
Terry Oldberg
Engineering, Mechanical Electrical Nuclear Software
Consultant, USA, Joined Oct 1999, 42

Terry Oldberg

Engineering, Mechanical Electrical Nuclear Software
Consultant,
USA,
Joined Oct 1999
42
03:37 Apr-19-2002
Re: Probability of detection
I have to disagree with Dave when he suggests that the process is well established, for the paper "Erratic Measure" (see http://www.ndt.net/article/v04n05/oldberg/oldberg.htm ) demonstrates that attempts at establishing a process for the statistics of defect detection have failed and that this failure is inherent in the process of defect detection itself. Thus, while advice on how to conduct studies on the statistics of NDT is indeed available, this advise must be incorrect.

: Dear Wang:
.
: It is not clear to me what you mean by a "format for POD".
.
: If you are looking for references describing how to conduct experiments to determine POD, I suggest you read:
.
: Floyd Spencer, Giancarlo Borgonovi, Dennis Roach, Don Schurman, Ron Smith
: Reliability Assessment at Airline Inspection Facilities Volume I:
: A Generic Protocol for Inspection Reliability Experiments
: DOT/FAA/CT-92/12, I
: March 1993
.
: Nondestructive Evaluation System Reliability Assessment
: MIL-HDBK-1823
: 30 April 1999
: (also available previously as AGARD-LS-190)
.
: These are of course aerospace-based.
.
: For a collection of POD data, see the NDE Capabilities Databook, 3rd edition, go to http://www.ntiac.com
.
: As for it being an art, I don't think that is the case. The experimental methods and statistical analysis methods for the experiment results are mature and have been published.
.
: What do you desire from a new approach?
.
: Regards, Dave.
.
: david.forsyth@nrc.ca
.
: : Dear All
: .
: : I am currently doing a literature survey to try to derive some meaningful generic format for POD (Probability of detection), to welded structures for a start. We are aiming to have a standard procedure at the end. This is following some large projects in the European scene, e.g. PISC, TIP, NORDTEST etc. It is noted that the probability of detection is dependent on so many points but to date, it is still an art rather than science, despite considerable investment over the many years.
: .
: : I would like to know, 1) any new approach to treat this old problem
: : 2) any relevant literature, e.g. data bank, QNDE etc.
: .
: : With many regards
: .
.



    
 
 
Tim MacInnis
Senior NDT Engineer
SAIC/Ultra Iamge International, USA, Joined Dec 1999, 10

Tim MacInnis

Senior NDT Engineer
SAIC/Ultra Iamge International,
USA,
Joined Dec 1999
10
03:46 Apr-26-2002
Re: Probability of detection
There are two publications I work from regarding PODs.
The first is the DOD/FAA pub "Reliability Assessment at Airline Inspection Facilities, V1: A Generic Protocol for Inspection Reliabilty Experiemnts", 1992.
The second publication is the DOD Hanbook "Nondestructive Evaluation System Reliability Assessment MIL-HNBK-1823, 30 Aprol 1999.
You may find the "format" you are looking for in these very informative publications.


    
 
 
Terry Oldberg
Engineering, Mechanical Electrical Nuclear Software
Consultant, USA, Joined Oct 1999, 42

Terry Oldberg

Engineering, Mechanical Electrical Nuclear Software
Consultant,
USA,
Joined Oct 1999
42
02:53 May-06-2002
Re: Probability of detection
Though I've not read the referenced documents, I doubt that they provide a solution for Wang. Documents of their era ignore a foundational weakness that is exposed in my 1995 paper, "Erratic Measure" ( http://www.ndt.net/article/v04n05/oldberg/oldberg.htm ). The weakness that I reference is violation of the axiom of probability theory that is known as "Unit Measure."

A false doctrine of this era makes the POD the measure of the reliability of a type of test that violates Unit Measure. If I'm not mistaken, the documents that you reference embrace this doctrine.

I do know that a MIL-SPEC that was in preparation by the DOD, circa 1990, embraced this doctrine and suspect that MIL-HNBK-1823 is this same document. I also know that the FAA's post-1992 research on Aging Aircraft fails to preserve Unit Measure and that the publication date of the FAA/DOD document that you reference is 1992.






    
 
 

GEKKO - Portable Phased Array Testing with TFM in Real-Time
The portable phased array testing system GEKKO provides 64 parallel test channels. On creating
KARL DEUTSCH
4 Showcases 5 Videos

NDT.net launched New Exhibition
The new Exhibition offers a gallery of product showcases and a buyers guide. A user-frindly
NDT.net
3 Videos

NDTkit RT
NDTkit RT, TESTIA's Digital Radiography software The NDTkit product line software for X-ray
TESTIA
5 Showcases 2 Videos Product Video

The New veo+ And DAAH DLA PA Package For Stainless Steel Weld Testing Is Now Available!
The good sizing capability of a 7.5MHz DAAH DLA probe paired with the superior capabilities of
Sonatest Ltd
5 Showcases 2 Videos

More Showcases

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window