where expertise comes together - since 1996

Web's Largest Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)
Open Access Database (Conference Proceedings, Articles, News), Exhibition, Forum, Network

All Forum Boards
Technical Discussions >
Ultrasonic Testing
Career Discussions
Job Offers
Job Seeks
Classified Ads
About NDT.net
Articles & News

IMechE Engineering Training Solutions
World leading provider of Non-Destructive Testing and Corrosion Prevention and Coatings training, examinations and Level 3 Consultancy Services

262 views
02:19 Jan-21-2003
Daron Branson
Ultrasonic Testing

Could someone please explain in detail the 6 dB drop method?


 
02:36 Jan-22-2003
Ed Trotter
Re: Ultrasonic Testing : Could someone please explain in detail the 6 dB drop method?
.
The 6dB drop method has been used for flaw sizing for many years. However it has been proven that it is not very accurate for the sizing of reflectors, which are smaller than the width of the beam at the sound path where the reflector is located, unless beam spread measurements are taken and compensated for.

For example, if you have a reflector response at 80% full screen height (FSH) and you move the search unit until the reflector drops to 40% FSH, you have reduced the signal by 50% or 6dB. There is a formula to calculate this. ((A1/A2 Log) x 20).

Theoretically, if a reflector is larger than the beam width and you move the probe until the signal is reduced by half (-6dB), that will give you the end points of the reflector.






 


© NDT.net - The Web's Largest Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT) ISSN 1435-4934

Open Access Database, |Conference Proceedings| |Articles| |News| |Exhibition| |Forum| |Professional Network|