where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

Phoenix Inspection Systems Limited
Design and manufacture ultrasonic Transducers, Scanners and Custom Solutions for NDT inspections. Innovators in NDT technology
221 views
Technical Discussions
David Harvey
Engineering
ATI - Wah Chang, USA, Joined Nov 2002, 42

David Harvey

Engineering
ATI - Wah Chang,
USA,
Joined Nov 2002
42
06:13 Mar-06-2003
Re: Reflector plate testing - description

Reflector plate testing is akin to thru-transmission, but only using one transducer. The sound passes through the material under test, is reflected back from a smooth plate parallel to and some given distance from the material tested, and back through the test material to the probe. The reflections from the reflector plate are monitored, with a decrease in amplitude signifying an indication.
Due to the need to support or fixture the thin material under test, this is a very time-consuming test, and we are looking very hard at replacing it with a back-surface loss type of test.
My request of the list members is for help in making sure I have not forgotten something obvious (or obscure) - at this point is seems our biggest concern is the possibility of a laminar defect that shows up at 1/2 thickness and would give us a signal that would fall on a back reflection on the time base.
Your comments and suggestions are much appreciated!!
: Mr. Harvey:
: Could you please provide a bit more information.
: I am not clear on what "reflector-plate" testing is.
: What are you monitoring or testing for. (Can I assume you are using some form of automated ultrasonic configuration?)
: Ed
.
: : We employ reflector-plate testing on relatively thin (0.090" to 0.500") refractory metals. I would very much like to change to a back - surface reflection moniotoring type of test. Does anyone have any wisdom to contribute to this question? I understand some of the obvious differences, but I am somewhat stymied in coming up with the justification for trying to change over to this test. Thank you for your assistance.
'
.




    
 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

GEKKO - Portable Phased Array Testing with TFM in Real-Time

The portable phased array testing system GEKKO provides 64 parallel test channels. On creating testi
...
ng parameters the operator is assisted by the CIVA software. Due to its modular set-up the GEKKO instrument is suitable for operators of all skill levels.
>

HARDNESS TESTER TKM-459CE combi

TKM-459CE combi applies 2 methods of hardness control: UCI and Leeb. It provides high-accuracy tes
...
ting of metals and alloys as well as items of different sizes and configurations, their hardened layers and galvanic coatings. Device represents results in HB, HRC, HV and others. Shock-, dust- and water-proof housing with intuitive software make this gauge easy to use in all working conditions.
>

NEOS III

NEOS III is Logos Imagings lightest DR system. With a built-in battery and internal wireless commu
...
nication, the NEOS III is perfect for users that want to quickly assess an item.
>

FlexoFORM™

The FlexoFORM™ solution integrates flexible phased array probe technology in a scanner to solv
...
e the challenges that come with inspecting pipe elbows. When combined with a water column, this solution can be used to collect easy-to-interpret data on elbows with diameters ranging from 4.5 in. OD up to flat and offers many benefits.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window