where expertise comes together - since 1996

Web's Largest Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)
Open Access Database (Conference Proceedings, Articles, News), Exhibition, Forum, Network

All Forum Boards
Technical Discussions >
Anamolies within pipe and plate wall
Career Discussions
Job Offers
Job Seeks
Classified Ads
About NDT.net
Articles & News

AMDATA Products (WesDyne)
AMDATA is an engineering and technical services firm dedicated to providing standard and custom nondestructive examinations (NDE) products and systems

820 views
01:48 Apr-10-1999
Lee Bird
Anamolies within pipe and plate wall

Greetings,
I am a level III UT,PT,MT and API 510 certified inspector.
I am researching a problem with steel plate and pipe that I hope someone may be able to share some expertise in. In our inspections as dictated by OSHA, and API we perform an "in service" examination of pipe and vessels within our facilities. By examining the outside surface of the material ultrasonically we can pick up wall loss due to corrosion, erosion or pitting. To have this type of discrimination we use a dual element technique . Using this technique Ultrasonic examination indicates numerous reflectors within the plate or steel wall. The OD and ID are not pitted, corroded or eroded.
I call this problem "dirty steel". This problem is occurring more and more often. Are there any guidelines other that ASME 435 that might yield some accept reject criteria? My e-mail address is lee.Bird@coastalcorp.com Has anyone else experienced this problem. I would be glad to share copies of my A-Scan traces for discussion.

Thank you



 
00:58 Apr-12-1999
Steven Cook
Re: Anamolies within pipe and plate wall
Mr. Bird,

You are having one fundamental problem that many people overlook when
performing UT thickness measurements on piping.

Where you have material thicknesses less than 3 mm the dual element
transducers thickness readings are no longer linear. Please refer to ASTM
03.03 E-797. (Since I am at home right now, I am not 100% sure of the "E"
number, but it is for UT contact thickness method).

ASTM has a chart showing the inaccuracies that occur when using a dual
element transducer on thin materials.

So far, we have successfully used 6mm diameter x 10 MHz single crystal
transducers with a delay line to keep the near field out of the test material.

I believe that when you switch to a single crystal transducer your metals
will look a little cleaner.

However, if you should find that you are still getting "dirty steel" then
the only acceptance criteria that I am aware of is ASTM E 435.

If your company is the owner of the pipes, then a "Fitness for Use"
acceptance criteria can be established, based on sound engineering
requirements.

I hope this has been of some use.


Steven Cook
FLITE
7 Jalan Permas 12/5
81750 Permas Jaya, Johor
Malaysia
Phone: 60-7-289-2242
Fax: 60-7-289-2243
e-mail: cook@pd.jaring.my

--------------
: Greetings,
: I am a level III UT,PT,MT and API 510 certified inspector.
: I am researching a problem with steel plate and pipe that I hope someone may be able to share some expertise in. In our inspections as dictated by OSHA, and API we perform an "in service" examination of pipe and vessels within our facilities. By examining the outside surface of the material ultrasonically we can pick up wall loss due to corrosion, erosion or pitting. To have this type of discrimination we use a dual element technique . Using this technique Ultrasonic examination indicates numerous reflectors within the plate or steel wall. The OD and ID are not pitted, corroded or eroded.
: I call this problem "dirty steel". This problem is occurring more and more often. Are there any guidelines other that ASME 435 that might yield some accept reject criteria? My e-mail address is lee.Bird@coastalcorp.com Has anyone else experienced this problem. I would be glad to share copies of my A-Scan traces for discussion.

: Thank you



 
02:09 Apr-12-1999
Manuel Haces
Re: Anamolies within pipe and plate wall : Greetings,
: I am a level III UT,PT,MT and API 510 certified inspector.
: I am researching a problem with steel plate and pipe that I hope someone may be able to share some expertise in. In our inspections as dictated by OSHA, and API we perform an "in service" examination of pipe and vessels within our facilities. By examining the outside surface of the material ultrasonically we can pick up wall loss due to corrosion, erosion or pitting. To have this type of discrimination we use a dual element technique . Using this technique Ultrasonic examination indicates numerous reflectors within the plate or steel wall. The OD and ID are not pitted, corroded or eroded.
: I call this problem "dirty steel". This problem is occurring more and more often. Are there any guidelines other that ASME 435 that might yield some accept reject criteria? My e-mail address is lee.Bird@coastalcorp.com Has anyone else experienced this problem. I would be glad to share copies of my A-Scan traces for discussion.

: Thank you

Please send me more information regarding the test, ID and OD of the pipe, thickness and a copy of
the A Scan, so I can send you my oppinion.



 
00:49 Apr-13-1999

Tom Nelligan

Engineering,
retired,
USA,
Joined Nov 1998
390
Re: Anamolies within pipe and plate wall

: I call this problem "dirty steel". This problem is occurring more and more often. Are there any guidelines other that ASME 435 that might yield some accept reject criteria? My e-mail address is lee.Bird@coastalcorp.com Has anyone else experienced this problem. I would be glad to share copies of my A-Scan traces for discussion.

It would be helpful to have more details about what you're doing: transducer type (frequency and diameter), instrument type, instrument gain and PRF settings, and pipe wall thickness. Plus a copy of the A-scan, if you could post that.

Yes, this phenomenon has been observed elsewhere, and you can even see it sometimes on grain-free, inclusion-free materials like fused silica if you turn gain up high enough. Off the top of my head I can think of a couple causes that I've observed. You can sometimes catch multiple reverberations from trapped couplant pockets if the test surface is rough. If the surface is smooth, many duals will generate a small surface wave component that creates a crosstalk effect as it leaks into the receiver side of the transducer. If your instrument PRF rate is too high, you might be seeing wraparound noise. All of these effects typically show up in a significant way only when gain levels are very high, and they can all cause noise patterns that change as you move the transducer, due to minor changes in coupling and/or pipe surface topography. If you're using a worn transducer that forces you to crank up the gain to very high levels, that could also be a contributing cause.

--Tom Nelligan
Panametrics, Inc.





 


© NDT.net - The Web's Largest Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT) ISSN 1435-4934

Open Access Database, |Conference Proceedings| |Articles| |News| |Exhibition| |Forum| |Professional Network|