where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -
564 views
Technical Discussions
John
John
09:10 Apr-09-2005
Burn Through

I have a question and would like other's opinion(s) on the subject.

In API-1104, 19th Edition, paragraph 9.3.6 states, "any length of internal concavity is acceptable provided the radiographic density of the radiographic image of the internal concavity does not exceed that of the thinnest adjacent parent material".

Now, Paragraph 9.3.7.2 discusses the acceptance of Burn Through. Esentially it says that burn through acceptance/rejection is based on the dimension of the burn through "and" the density.

For example, if an indication of burn through is observed on the radiograph, and it is exactly or a little less than 1/4" but the density of the burn through is 2.8 and the density of the adjacent base material is 2.3, is the burn through considered rejected or accepted?

Do you then evaluate it as internal concavity and reject it?


 
 Reply 
 
Clamp
Clamp
05:49 Apr-17-2005
Re: Burn Through
Personally I would reject it based on the fact that that area of the weld is darker than the density of the base material. "When in doubt...cut it out!"

----------- Start Original Message -----------
: I have a question and would like other's opinion(s) on the subject.
: In API-1104, 19th Edition, paragraph 9.3.6 states, "any length of internal concavity is acceptable provided the radiographic density of the radiographic image of the internal concavity does not exceed that of the thinnest adjacent parent material".
: Now, Paragraph 9.3.7.2 discusses the acceptance of Burn Through. Esentially it says that burn through acceptance/rejection is based on the dimension of the burn through "and" the density.
: For example, if an indication of burn through is observed on the radiograph, and it is exactly or a little less than 1/4" but the density of the burn through is 2.8 and the density of the adjacent base material is 2.3, is the burn through considered rejected or accepted?
: Do you then evaluate it as internal concavity and reject it?
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

IntraPhase Athena Phased Array System

The Athena Phased Array system, manufactured by WesDyne NDE Products & Technology, consists of a pha
...
sed array acquisition system and PC running IntraSpect software. A PC is used to perform acquisition, analysis and storage of the data. System hardware is capable of operating up to four data sets with any combination of phased array or conventional UT probes. NOW AVAILABLE IN 64-64 CONFIGURATION.
>

SONOAIR - air-coupled Phased Array Ultrasonic Inspection System

For highly attenuating materials, the performance of the system is critical. The ultrasonic sensors,
...
the scanning area and the system settings should be flexibly adapted to the test task and the material. These high expectations are met with the new and modular testing system SONOAIR. With the world’s first air-coupled phased-array UT inspection system SONOAIR we developed a technology that works with up to 4 transmitter and receiver channels with freely configurable square wave burst transmitters as wells as low noise receiving amplifiers.
>

Varex Imaging Large Field of View (FOV) Digital Detector Arrays (DDAs)

A larger FOV DDA can reduce the space and volume of the X-ray inspection system on the factory floor
...
, enable faster scanning times, better throughput and better resolution images at a lower dose. Customers can also save time and money. With these benefits in mind, Varex Imaging has designed a family of large FOV detectors (4343HE, XRD 1611, 4343DX-I, 4343CT) for our industrial imaging customers.
>

AMIGO2

TSC Amigo2 - ACFM technology has developed a solid reputation for accurately detecting and sizing
...
surface-breaking cracks through paint and coatings. As the industry demands increased performance in speed, signal quality, and portability, it’s time for an evolution. It’s time for Amigo2.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window