where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

NDTSS - Non Destructive Testing Society of Singapore
Visit us at SINCE 2019
1553 views
Technical Discussions
Ron Olson
R & D, Aviation
The Best Aviation Company In The World, USA, Joined Feb 2005, 23

Ron Olson

R & D, Aviation
The Best Aviation Company In The World,
USA,
Joined Feb 2005
23
06:12 Oct-05-2005
Conductivity and Multiple Layers

Trying to remember my physics...

Given three different conductivities:
sigma 1
sigma 2
sigma 3

Given same thickness for each layer of conductivity with no air gaps between layers
Given each layer of conductivity is directly under the other, i.e., sigma1 on top, then sigma2 below sigma1, and so on.

Is the total conductivity computed this way?

1/sigma total = 1/sigma1 + 1/sigma2 + 1/sigma3

Is this the same equation for dielectrics and capacitors in series and resistors in parallel?

Thank you.



 
 Reply 
 
Ed Ginzel
R & D, -
Materials Research Institute, Canada, Joined Nov 1998, 1292

Ed Ginzel

R & D, -
Materials Research Institute,
Canada,
Joined Nov 1998
1292
03:38 Oct-07-2005
Re: Conductivity and Multiple Layers
Ron:
I think there is much more variability in layered conductivity assessment than the simple "stacking" of capacitors.
Even after you have definitely "decided" on the absolute values of the layers' component conductivities, you still have thickness effects, surface irregularity effects at the bond interfaces and the field effect of the coil used.
Possibly the most convenient method of "estimating" the expected conductivity value you will get for a multi-layer condition is by modelling. Some work has been done in this venue. A great article is to be found on www.NDT.net at
http://www.ndt.net/article/wcndt00/papers/idn228/idn228.htm

The software TEDDY that was provided for this paper is a great start on understanding the variability of results that occurs with variation in the parameters involved. The modelling programme is limited to maximum 2 layers but even then you can see that a simple addition is not the solution. in Eddy Current Testing you are using a field effect to determineconductivity. How far that field has penetrated the sample and the layer thicknesses along the way will determine the value you get. This is an indirect measurement technique.

I think TEDDY was a shareware. It has a great set of parameter options including geometry of part tested, coil parameters, liftoff, sample conductivity and permeability. As you will see from the article link, impedance plane diagrams are provided.
Regards
Ed
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Trying to remember my physics...
: Given three different conductivities:

: sigma 1
: sigma 2
: sigma 3
: Given same thickness for each layer of conductivity with no air gaps between layers
: Given each layer of conductivity is directly under the other, i.e., sigma1 on top, then sigma2 below sigma1, and so on.
: Is the total conductivity computed this way?
: 1/sigma total = 1/sigma1 + 1/sigma2 + 1/sigma3
: Is this the same equation for dielectrics and capacitors in series and resistors in parallel?
: Thank you.
------------ End Original Message ------------




1
 
 Reply 
 
Ron Olson
R & D, Aviation
The Best Aviation Company In The World, USA, Joined Feb 2005, 23

Ron Olson

R & D, Aviation
The Best Aviation Company In The World,
USA,
Joined Feb 2005
23
03:44 Oct-07-2005
Re: Conductivity and Multiple Layers
Thank you, Mr. Ginzel.

I'll read this article soon. Looks promising. I may give my thoughts after I read the article. BTW, what does TEDDY mean? I hope the shareware is available!

I believe the equation I gave is correct - ideally. I know that I'm assuming homogeneity, perfect contacts and perfect surfaces but essentialy the equation works. Since, conductivity and resistivity are just another way of stating Ohm's Law: the current density, J, is proportional to the applied electric field, E, by the materials conductivity, o. IOW, J=oE.

I may have time to empirically prove this. Anyone else done this by experiment?

----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Ron:
: I think there is much more variability in layered conductivity assessment than the simple "stacking" of capacitors.
: Even after you have definitely "decided" on the absolute values of the layers' component conductivities, you still have thickness effects, surface irregularity effects at the bond interfaces and the field effect of the coil used.
: Possibly the most convenient method of "estimating" the expected conductivity value you will get for a multi-layer condition is by modelling. Some work has been done in this venue. A great article is to be found on www.NDT.net at
: http://www.ndt.net/article/wcndt00/papers/idn228/idn228.htm
:
: The software TEDDY that was provided for this paper is a great start on understanding the variability of results that occurs with variation in the parameters involved. The modelling programme is limited to maximum 2 layers but even then you can see that a simple addition is not the solution. in Eddy Current Testing you are using a field effect to determine conductivity. How far that field has penetrated the sample and the layer thicknesses along the way will determine the value you get. This is an indirect measurement technique.
: I think TEDDY was a shareware. It has a great set of parameter options including geometry of part tested, coil parameters, liftoff, sample conductivity and permeability. As you will see from the article link, impedance plane diagrams are provided.
: Regards
: Ed
: : Trying to remember my physics...
: : Given three different conductivities:
: : sigma 1
: : sigma 2
: : sigma 3
: : Given same thickness for each layer of conductivity with no air gaps between layers
: : Given each layer of conductivity is directly under the other, i.e., sigma1 on top, then sigma2 below sigma1, and so on.
: : Is the total conductivity computed this way?
: : 1/sigma total = 1/sigma1 + 1/sigma2 + 1/sigma3
: : Is this the same equation for dielectrics and capacitors in series and resistors in parallel?
: : Thank you.
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 
Ron Olson
R & D, Aviation
The Best Aviation Company In The World, USA, Joined Feb 2005, 23

Ron Olson

R & D, Aviation
The Best Aviation Company In The World,
USA,
Joined Feb 2005
23
03:48 Oct-07-2005
Re: Conductivity and Multiple Layers
"IOW, J=oE."

Yeah, I just noticed this...a good cup of joe is very conductive! :D


----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Thank you, Mr. Ginzel.
: I'll read this article soon. Looks promising. I may give my thoughts after I read the article. BTW, what does TEDDY mean? I hope the shareware is available!
: I believe the equation I gave is correct - ideally. I know that I'm assuming homogeneity, perfect contacts and perfect surfaces but essentialy the equation works. Since, conductivity and resistivity are just another way of stating Ohm's Law: the current density, J, is proportional to the applied electric field, E, by the materials conductivity, o. IOW, J=oE.
: I may have time to empirically prove this. Anyone else done this by experiment?
: : Ron:
: : I think there is much more variability in layered conductivity assessment than the simple "stacking" of capacitors.
: : Even after you have definitely "decided" on the absolute values of the layers' component conductivities, you still have thickness effects, surface irregularity effects at the bond interfaces and the field effect of the coil used.
: : Possibly the most convenient method of "estimating" the expected conductivity value you will get for a multi-layer condition is by modelling. Some work has been done in this venue. A great article is to be found on www.NDT.net at
: : http://www.ndt.net/article/wcndt00/papers/idn228/idn228.htm
: :
: : The software TEDDY that was provided for this paper is a great start on understanding the variability of results that occurs with variation in the parameters involved. The modelling programme is limited to maximum 2 layers but even then you can see that a simple addition is not the solution. in Eddy Current Testing you are using a field effect to determine conductivity. How far that field has penetrated the sample and the layer thicknesses along the way will determine the value you get. This is an indirect measurement technique.
: : I think TEDDY wasa shareware. It has a great set of parameter options including geometry of part tested, coil parameters, liftoff, sample conductivity and permeability. As you will see from the article link, impedance plane diagrams are provided.
: : Regards
: : Ed
: : : Trying to remember my physics...
: : : Given three different conductivities:
: : : sigma 1
: : : sigma 2
: : : sigma 3
: : : Given same thickness for each layer of conductivity with no air gaps between layers
: : : Given each layer of conductivity is directly under the other, i.e., sigma1 on top, then sigma2 below sigma1, and so on.
: : : Is the total conductivity computed this way?
: : : 1/sigma total = 1/sigma1 + 1/sigma2 + 1/sigma3
: : : Is this the same equation for dielectrics and capacitors in series and resistors in parallel?
: : : Thank you.
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 
Theodoros Theodoulidis
Theodoros Theodoulidis
05:27 Oct-08-2005
Re: Conductivity and Multiple Layers
Hi, I am the author of the TEDDY-freeware. This is a simple program that can be used for calculations of coil impedance in a number of important eddy current test geometries. It uses analytical modelling and relies heavily on the well-known Dodd and Deeds models.

The software is rather old now (about 5 years) and there has not been any newer version. I intend to upgrade it (whenever I find time) for two reasons:
1) To add additional features like text-file reporting.
2) To add additional geometries. Due to the resurgence of interest in analytical models for eddy current NDE, we now have rapid and accurate models for geometries involving for example ferrite core probes, edges and cracks.

I would like to thank all the people that asked and tested the software. Their feedback will prove very helpful in the next version. Meanwhile, the old freeware version is available on request to theodoul@ieee.org.

Theodoros Theodoulidis
University of West Macedonia
Greece


----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Thank you, Mr. Ginzel.
: I'll read this article soon. Looks promising. I may give my thoughts after I read the article. BTW, what does TEDDY mean? I hope the shareware is available!
: I believe the equation I gave is correct - ideally. I know that I'm assuming homogeneity, perfect contacts and perfect surfaces but essentialy the equation works. Since, conductivity and resistivity are just another way of stating Ohm's Law: the current density, J, is proportional to the applied electric field, E, by the materials conductivity, o. IOW, J=oE.
: I may have time to empirically prove this. Anyone else done this by experiment?
: : Ron:
: : I think there is much more variability in layered conductivity assessment than the simple "stacking" of capacitors.
: : Even after you have definitely "decided" on the absolute values of the layers' component conductivities, you still have thickness effects, surface irregularity effects at the bond interfaces and the field effectof the coil used.
: : Possibly the most convenient method of "estimating" the expected conductivity value you will get for a multi-layer condition is by modelling. Some work has been done in this venue. A great article is to be found on www.NDT.net at
: : http://www.ndt.net/article/wcndt00/papers/idn228/idn228.htm
: :
: : The software TEDDY that was provided for this paper is a great start on understanding the variability of results that occurs with variation in the parameters involved. The modelling programme is limited to maximum 2 layers but even then you can see that a simple addition is not the solution. in Eddy Current Testing you are using a field effect to determine conductivity. How far that field has penetrated the sample and the layer thicknesses along the way will determine the value you get. This is an indirect measurement technique.
: : I think TEDDY was a shareware. It has a great set of parameter options including geometry of part tested, coil parameters, liftoff, sample conductivity and permeability. As you will see from the article link, impedance plane diagrams are provided.
: : Regards
: : Ed
: : : Trying to remember my physics...
: : : Given three different conductivities:
: : : sigma 1
: : : sigma 2
: : : sigma 3
: : : Given same thickness for each layer of conductivity with no air gaps between layers
: : : Given each layer of conductivity is directly under the other, i.e., sigma1 on top, then sigma2 below sigma1, and so on.
: : : Is the total conductivity computed this way?
: : : 1/sigma total = 1/sigma1 + 1/sigma2 + 1/sigma3
: : : Is this the same equation for dielectrics and capacitors in series and resistors in parallel?
: : : Thank you.
------------ End Original Message ------------




1
 
 Reply 
 
Ilayaraja
Ilayaraja
00:43 Oct-27-2006
Re: Conductivity and Multiple Layers
i require teddy software pls mail me the web add

----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Hi, I am the author of the TEDDY-freeware. This is a simple program that can be used for calculations of coil impedance in a number of important eddy current test geometries. It uses analytical modelling and relies heavily on the well-known Dodd and Deeds models.
: The software is rather old now (about 5 years) and there has not been any newer version. I intend to upgrade it (whenever I find time) for two reasons:
: 1) To add additional features like text-file reporting.
: 2) To add additional geometries. Due to the resurgence of interest in analytical models for eddy current NDE, we now have rapid and accurate models for geometries involving for example ferrite core probes, edges and cracks.
: I would like to thank all the people that asked and tested the software. Their feedback will prove very helpful in the next version. Meanwhile, the old freeware version is available on request to theodoul@ieee.org.
: Theodoros Theodoulidis
: University of West Macedonia
: Greece
:
: : Thank you, Mr. Ginzel.
: : I'll read this article soon. Looks promising. I may give my thoughts after I read the article. BTW, what does TEDDY mean? I hope the shareware is available!
: : I believe the equation I gave is correct - ideally. I know that I'm assuming homogeneity, perfect contacts and perfect surfaces but essentialy the equation works. Since, conductivity and resistivity are just another way of stating Ohm's Law: the current density, J, is proportional to the applied electric field, E, by the materials conductivity, o. IOW, J=oE.
: : I may have time to empirically prove this. Anyone else done this by experiment?
: : : Ron:
: : : I think there is much more variability in layered conductivity assessment than the simple "stacking" of capacitors.
: : : Even after you have definitely "decided" on the absolute values of the layers' component conductivities, you still have thickness effects, surface irregularity effects at the bond interfaces and the field effect of the coil used.
: : : Possibly the most convenient method of "estimating" the expected conductivity value you will get for a multi-layer condition is by modelling. Some work has been done in this venue. A great article is to be found on www.NDT.net at
: : : http://www.ndt.net/article/wcndt00/papers/idn228/idn228.htm
: : :
: : : The software TEDDY that was provided for this paper is a great start on understanding the variability of results that occurs with variation in the parameters involved. The modelling programme is limited to maximum 2 layers but even then you can see that a simple addition is not the solution. in Eddy Current Testing you are using a field effect to determine conductivity. How far that field has penetrated the sample and the layer thicknesses along the way will determine the value you get. This is an indirect measurement technique.
: : : I think TEDDY was a shareware. It has a great set of parameter options including geometry of part tested, coil parameters, liftoff, sample conductivity and permeability. As you will see from the article link, impedance plane diagrams are provided.
: : : Regards
: : : Ed
: : : : Trying to remember my physics...
: : : : Given three different conductivities:
: : : : sigma 1
: : : : sigma 2
: : : : sigma 3
: : : : Given same thickness for each layer of conductivity with no air gaps between layers
: : : : Given each layer of conductivity is directly under the other, i.e., sigma1 on top, then sigma2 below sigma1, and so on.
: : : : Is the total conductivity computed this way?
: : : : 1/sigma total = 1/sigma1 + 1/sigma2 + 1/sigma3
: : : : Is this the same equation for dielectrics and capacitors in series and resistors in parallel?
: : : : Thank you.
------------ End Original Message ------------




1
 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

Sci Aps Z-Series Portable Handheld Analysers

The world’s only handheld analyzer that measures carbon content in stainless (yes even L-grades),s
...
teels, and cast irons. Also accepted for low Si analysis for sulfidic corrosion analysis, and is widely used in the power industry for Cr analysis, for flow accelerated corrosion applications.
>

Research and Application Development For NDT

Acuren’s Research and Application Development specializes in the development of advanced ultraso
...
nic inspection techniques and systems for challenging inspection applications, with an emphasis on practical solutions which are field deployable. Services include manual and automated ultrasonic inspection system development, inspection technique optimization using laboratory scale studies and ultrasonic modeling (CIVA, BeamTool), preparing technical justification for technique evaluation and qualification (Probability of Detection and sizing accuracy studies), inspection/calibration/analysis procedure preparation to support field deployment of custom techniques, and development of custom imaging algorithms to support challenging inspection applications.
>

Varex Imaging Large Field of View (FOV) Digital Detector Arrays (DDAs)

A larger FOV DDA can reduce the space and volume of the X-ray inspection system on the factory floor
...
, enable faster scanning times, better throughput and better resolution images at a lower dose. Customers can also save time and money. With these benefits in mind, Varex Imaging has designed a family of large FOV detectors (4343HE, XRD 1611, 4343DX-I, 4343CT) for our industrial imaging customers.
>

NOVO Armor 15 & NOVO Armor 22

The Armor Kit Contains the NOVO Armor, which provides additional mechanical protection to the NOVO 1
...
5WN & NOVO 22WN Detectors, the Armor Stand and a traveling soft cover. - Newest shock absorbent technology case - Water resistant design - Supports wired & wireless communication - Multiple positioning options - Tripod connection using the Built-in 1/4” threads - Simple Detector battery replacement
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window