where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

805 views
Technical Discussions
A.A.AMIRI
Consultant, NDT/QC/WELD INSPECTION
Iran, Joined Nov 2005, 20

A.A.AMIRI

Consultant, NDT/QC/WELD INSPECTION
Iran,
Joined Nov 2005
20
04:30 Nov-05-2005
Compairing of RT UT Results

Dear Friends,
Whats Your Action When a Weld Seam is Accepted By UT But Not Accepted By RT or Vice Versa.Suppose Both Test Accomplished Acc. to ASME & You Are Free For Test Selection.

Regard,



    
 
 
John D
John D
04:39 Nov-05-2005
Re: Compairing of RT UT Results
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Dear Friends,
: Whats Your Action When a Weld Seam is Accepted By UT But Not Accepted By RT or Vice Versa.Suppose Both Test Accomplished Acc. to ASME & You Are Free For Test Selection.
: Regard,
------------ End Original Message ------------

If you choose to perform RT or UT on a weld and it is found to be rejected, then it is rejected. You cannot buy off an indication with another method after it is rejected. If the first test showed it to be acceptable, then why would you use another method?




    
 
 
Juan Amado
Engineering, Inspection
Arco Industrial, S.A., Panama, Joined Nov 2001, 44

Juan Amado

Engineering, Inspection
Arco Industrial, S.A.,
Panama,
Joined Nov 2001
44
04:47 Nov-07-2005
Re: Compairing of RT UT Results
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: : Dear Friends,
: : Whats Your Action When a Weld Seam is Accepted By UT But Not Accepted By RT or Vice Versa.Suppose Both Test Accomplished Acc. to ASME & You Are Free For Test Selection.
: : Regard,
: If you choose to perform RT or UT on a weld and it is found to be rejected, then it is rejected. You cannot buy off an indication with another method after it is rejected. If the first test showed it to be acceptable, then why would you use another method?
------------ End Original Message ------------

RT and UT are complementary testing methods, that is, each one covers an area of weakness of the other. It is very possible to have flaws on a specimen that would be easily detectable by one method and completely missed by the other (one clear and easy example is laminations on a steel plate). UT would pick these up easily but RT would not detect anything.

If the quality control system allows for choosing either the RT or UT method, the criteria for so choosing should be based on the applicability of such method to the weld joint geometry and other considerations of that nature. In this "either/or" case, the results of the selected test are final. If the test shows rejection, then rejection it is, and if it shows acceptance, then acceptance it is.

In a case where both tests are required, then if any test shows rejection then rejection it is. In other words, if both tests are required, the part would have to pass both tests in order to be accepted.

Hope this helps,
Juan Amado



    
 
 
Collin Maloney
NDT Inspector, - Plant Inspector
Applus RTD, Australia, Joined Nov 2000, 147

Collin Maloney

NDT Inspector, - Plant Inspector
Applus RTD,
Australia,
Joined Nov 2000
147
06:32 Nov-07-2005
Re: Compairing of RT UT Results
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Dear Friends,
: Whats Your Action When a Weld Seam is Accepted By UT But Not Accepted By RT or Vice Versa.Suppose Both Test Accomplished Acc. to ASME & You Are Free For Test Selection.
: Regard,
------------ End Original Message ------------




    
 
 
Collin Maloney
NDT Inspector, - Plant Inspector
Applus RTD, Australia, Joined Nov 2000, 147

Collin Maloney

NDT Inspector, - Plant Inspector
Applus RTD,
Australia,
Joined Nov 2000
147
06:36 Nov-07-2005
Re: Compairing of RT UT Results
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Dear Friends,
: Whats Your Action When a Weld Seam is Accepted By UT But Not Accepted By RT or Vice Versa.Suppose Both Test Accomplished Acc. to ASME & You Are Free For Test Selection.
: Regard,
------------ End Original Message ------------

When you have chosen your desired inspection method i.e. RT / UT, codes do not allow you to inter change. This principal is carried through in the inspection once a repair is effected, the same technique as that initially used, must be used to re examine that weld.



    
 
 

Product Spotlight

FAAST-PA! OEM Patented phased Array for high speed UT inspection

Multiangle, Multifocus, Multifrequency, Multibeam. Instead of stacking UT electronics and having m
...
any PA probes, FAAST-PA is able to transmit all delay laws within ONE single shot in Real time.
>

High Resolution Industrial CT System for Small/Medium Size Parts Inspection - YXLON FF35 CT

The YXLON FF35 CT computed tomography system is designed to achieve extremely precise inspection r
...
esults for a wide range of applications. Available in a single or dual tube configuration, it is perfect for very small to medium size parts inspection in the automotive, electronics, aviation, and material science industries.
>

Sci Aps Z-Series Portable Handheld Analysers

The world’s only handheld analyzer that measures carbon content in stainless (yes even L-grades),s
...
teels, and cast irons. Also accepted for low Si analysis for sulfidic corrosion analysis, and is widely used in the power industry for Cr analysis, for flow accelerated corrosion applications.
>

Conformable wedge transducer

The conformability is obtained with a flexible membrane filled with water between the transducer and
...
the inspected component. The coupling between the membrane and the component requires a small quantity of water or couplant. The conformable wedge combines the acoustic performance of immersion technique with good coupling and low attenuation.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window