where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -
846 views
Technical Discussions
A.A.AMIRI
Consultant, NDT/QC/WELD INSPECTION
Iran, Joined Nov 2005, 20

A.A.AMIRI

Consultant, NDT/QC/WELD INSPECTION
Iran,
Joined Nov 2005
20
04:30 Nov-05-2005
Compairing of RT UT Results

Dear Friends,
Whats Your Action When a Weld Seam is Accepted By UT But Not Accepted By RT or Vice Versa.Suppose Both Test Accomplished Acc. to ASME & You Are Free For Test Selection.

Regard,



    
 
 Reply 
 
John D
John D
04:39 Nov-05-2005
Re: Compairing of RT UT Results
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Dear Friends,
: Whats Your Action When a Weld Seam is Accepted By UT But Not Accepted By RT or Vice Versa.Suppose Both Test Accomplished Acc. to ASME & You Are Free For Test Selection.
: Regard,
------------ End Original Message ------------

If you choose to perform RT or UT on a weld and it is found to be rejected, then it is rejected. You cannot buy off an indication with another method after it is rejected. If the first test showed it to be acceptable, then why would you use another method?




    
 
 Reply 
 
Juan Amado
Engineering, Inspection
Arco Industrial, S.A., Panama, Joined Nov 2001, 44

Juan Amado

Engineering, Inspection
Arco Industrial, S.A.,
Panama,
Joined Nov 2001
44
04:47 Nov-07-2005
Re: Compairing of RT UT Results
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: : Dear Friends,
: : Whats Your Action When a Weld Seam is Accepted By UT But Not Accepted By RT or Vice Versa.Suppose Both Test Accomplished Acc. to ASME & You Are Free For Test Selection.
: : Regard,
: If you choose to perform RT or UT on a weld and it is found to be rejected, then it is rejected. You cannot buy off an indication with another method after it is rejected. If the first test showed it to be acceptable, then why would you use another method?
------------ End Original Message ------------

RT and UT are complementary testing methods, that is, each one covers an area of weakness of the other. It is very possible to have flaws on a specimen that would be easily detectable by one method and completely missed by the other (one clear and easy example is laminations on a steel plate). UT would pick these up easily but RT would not detect anything.

If the quality control system allows for choosing either the RT or UT method, the criteria for so choosing should be based on the applicability of such method to the weld joint geometry and other considerations of that nature. In this "either/or" case, the results of the selected test are final. If the test shows rejection, then rejection it is, and if it shows acceptance, then acceptance it is.

In a case where both tests are required, then if any test shows rejection then rejection it is. In other words, if both tests are required, the part would have to pass both tests in order to be accepted.

Hope this helps,
Juan Amado



    
 
 Reply 
 
Collin Maloney
NDT Inspector, - Plant Inspector
Applus RTD, Australia, Joined Nov 2000, 147

Collin Maloney

NDT Inspector, - Plant Inspector
Applus RTD,
Australia,
Joined Nov 2000
147
06:32 Nov-07-2005
Re: Compairing of RT UT Results
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Dear Friends,
: Whats Your Action When a Weld Seam is Accepted By UT But Not Accepted By RT or Vice Versa.Suppose Both Test Accomplished Acc. to ASME & You Are Free For Test Selection.
: Regard,
------------ End Original Message ------------




    
 
 Reply 
 
Collin Maloney
NDT Inspector, - Plant Inspector
Applus RTD, Australia, Joined Nov 2000, 147

Collin Maloney

NDT Inspector, - Plant Inspector
Applus RTD,
Australia,
Joined Nov 2000
147
06:36 Nov-07-2005
Re: Compairing of RT UT Results
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Dear Friends,
: Whats Your Action When a Weld Seam is Accepted By UT But Not Accepted By RT or Vice Versa.Suppose Both Test Accomplished Acc. to ASME & You Are Free For Test Selection.
: Regard,
------------ End Original Message ------------

When you have chosen your desired inspection method i.e. RT / UT, codes do not allow you to inter change. This principal is carried through in the inspection once a repair is effected, the same technique as that initially used, must be used to re examine that weld.



    
 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

SITEX CPSERIES

Teledyne ICM’s CPSERIES has been designed with a view to revolutionizing the handling and perfor
...
mances of portable X-Ray sets. Despite having managed to halve the weight of similar portable X-Ray generators available on the market (while continuing to provide the same power output), the SITEX CPSERIES generators feature a shutter, a laser pointer, a beryllium window, an aluminum filter and two integrated diaphragms (customized sizes are available upon request). Without compromising the robustness and reliability for which ICM products are renowned, the small size and light weight of the SITEX CPSERIES will radically change the way that you perform your RT inspections. And you will see a positive impact in terms of both quality and return on investment (ROI).
>

NDTkit RT

NDTkit RT, TESTIA's Digital Radiography software The NDTkit product line software for X-ray analysi
...
s. NDTkit RT is a software benefiting from the Ultis kernel which is dedicated to radiographic image analysis. It offers a set of tools and filtering processes to assist RT operators in finding relevant flaws.
>

Semi-Automated Phased Array Immersion System for Small Composite Parts

Turn-key semi-automated system as an improved and affordable solution for inspection of small comp
...
osite parts. Includes support table, immersion tank, scanner, PA instrument, PC, Analysis software, database, wedge management and other options.
>

SONOAIR - air-coupled Phased Array Ultrasonic Inspection System

For highly attenuating materials, the performance of the system is critical. The ultrasonic sensors,
...
the scanning area and the system settings should be flexibly adapted to the test task and the material. These high expectations are met with the new and modular testing system SONOAIR. With the world’s first air-coupled phased-array UT inspection system SONOAIR we developed a technology that works with up to 4 transmitter and receiver channels with freely configurable square wave burst transmitters as wells as low noise receiving amplifiers.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window